Sanborn v. McKeagney

Decision Date15 January 1918
Citation229 Mass. 300
PartiesSALLY SANBORN v. THOMAS B. MCKEAGNEY.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Present RUGG, C.

J., DE COURCY CROSBY, PIERCE, & CARROLL, JJ.

Negligence, Of one controlling real estate. Snow and Ice. Way, Public.

In an action for personal injuries sustained by falling on ice on the sidewalk in front of the house of the defendant that was formed from water flowing from a conductor which drained the roof of a house adjoining that of the defendant and was on or near the dividing line between the two houses, there was no evidence tending to show that the defendant controlled the conductor or that any water from his house drained into it, and it was held that there was no ground on which the defendant could be found to be liable for the plaintiff's injuries.

In the action above described there was no evidence of any ordinance requiring the defendant to keep the sidewalk adjoining his house free from snow and ice, but it was said, that, even if there had been such evidence, the defendant could not have been found to have been liable.

TORT for personal injuries sustained on December 16, 1916, alleged to have been caused by slipping upon an accumulation of ice on the sidewalk in front of and adjoining the house of the defendant numbered 40 on Albion Street in Boston. Writ in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston dated May 9, 1917.

The evidence at the trial in the Municipal Court is described in the opinion. The defendant asked the judge to rule that upon all the evidence the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The judge refused to make this ruling and made the following finding: "I find that the plaintiff sustained the injuries complained of through slipping upon ice upon the sidewalk in front of the defendant's house, which ice was formed by the accumulation of water there coming from a conductor which then and for a period of years previously drained the roof of the adjoining house and was located on or about the dividing line between the houses, and that the ice formed by its discharge was negligently allowed by the defendant to remain on his sidewalk. No part of the defendant's roof was drained by the conductor."

The judge found for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500 and at the request of the defendant reported the case to the Appellate

Division. The Appellate Division made an order vacating the finding and ordering that judgment be entered for the defendant.

The plaintiff appealed.

P. Daly, for the plaintiff. L. C. Doyle, for the defendant.

BY THE COURT. The material facts as stated in the report are that the plaintiff, a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Nelson v. Economy Grocery Stores
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1940
    ...caused by others and in which it did not participate. Dahlin v. Walsh, 192 Mass. 163, 77 N.E. 830, 6 L.R.A.,N.S., 615; Sanborn v. McKeagney, 229 Mass. 300, 118 N.E. 263;Tiffany v. F. Vorenberg Co., 238 Mass. 183, 130 N.E. 193, 14 A.L.R. 222;Agnew v. Franks, 255 Mass. 539, 152 N.E. 346;Catin......
  • Pickett v. Waldorf Sys., Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1922
    ...defendant. The defendant was not liable to the plaintiff if the ice on which she slipped formed from natural causes. Sanborn v. McKeagney, 229 Mass. 300, 118 N. E. 263, and cases there cited; Hart v. Wright, 235 Mass. 243, 126 N. E. 383;Tiffany v. Vorenberg Co., 238 Mass. 183, 130 N. E. 193......
  • Agnew v. Franks
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1926
    ...Street Railway, 209 Mass. 345, 348, 95 N. E. 751; but here the evidence goes beyond mere surmise and conjecture. Sanborn v. McKeagney, 229 Mass. 300, 118 N. E. 263, and Tiffany v. F. Vorenberg Co., 238 Mass. 183, 130 N. E. 193, 14 A. L. R. 222, cited by the defendants, do not establish that......
  • Mahoney v. Perreault
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1931
    ...276, 35 N. E. 1068;Newton v. Worcester, 174 Mass. 181, 54 N. E. 521;Bailey v. Cambridge, 174 Mass. 188, 54 N. E. 523;Sanborn v. McKeagney, 229 Mass. 300, 118 N. E. 263;Hart v. Wright, 235 Mass. 243, 126 N. E. 383;Lucas v. Thayer, 263 Mass. 313, 160 N. E. 810;Grimm v. Promboim, 265 Mass. 480......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT