Sanchez v. People
| Decision Date | 23 February 1960 |
| Docket Number | No. 19081,19081 |
| Citation | 349 P.2d 561,142 Colo. 58 |
| Parties | , 78 A.L.R.2d 775 Joe Walter SANCHEZ, Plaintiff in Error, v. PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Defendant in Error. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Robert C. Wilson, Lakewood, for plaintiff in error.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Gerald Harrison, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
Sanchez was convicted of, and sentenced for, burglary of an outside telephone booth which was located about twenty-five feet from a filling station. He admitted that he was caught in the act of prying the cover off the coin box in the booth. His principal assignment of error is that the trial court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict in that he contends a telephone booth is not a building within the meaning of our statute on burglary (C.R.S. '53, 40-3-6) as amended in 1957.
Historically, burglary was the common law crime of breaking and entering a dwelling at night with felonious intent. Stowell v. People, 1939, 104 Colo. 255, 90 P.2d 520. This has long since been altered by statute in most jurisdictions to broaden the scope of the crime to cover various enumerated structures.
Prior to the 1957 amendment the 1889 Colorado burglary statute listed a variety of structures as within its terms including a dwelling house, church, kitchen, office, saloon, watercraft, school house, and railroad car along with others. The amendment defined burglary in terms of entry with felonious intent into '* * * any building, railroad car, or trailer. * * *'.
It seems obvious that the legislature, in adopting the amendment in question, sought to have one overall generic term, i. e., 'building' encompass not only the variety of structures it had listed before, but also to cover all types of structures known but not then included and possibly other types which might be invented in the future. Since a building is generally considered to be an edifice, erected by art, and fixed upon or over the soil (1 Bouv.Law Dict. Rawle's Third Revision, p. 400), the legislature in 1957 wisely left in the statute 'railroad car(s)' and added 'trailer(s)' since these objects generally are not stationary and because trailers have been developed since the original act was adopted. Thus now all stationary structures within Colorado, no matter of what substance they may be constructed, are within the term building, so long as they are designed for use in the position in which they are fixed. As a separate class it provided that both railroad cars and trailers, which were in widespread use in 1957 both as dwellings and for the storage or carriage of personal property, were included as the subject of burglary. With the advent of the space age the Congress or state legislatures may soon be amending such statutes to include those buildings not only resting on the earth's surface but also those in the air or in space as well.
Though a telephone booth may be only a 'closet' by dictionary definition (See Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary of The English Language, 1954 ed.) when within another structure, it is a building within the purview of this act...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Oldham
...for the habitation of man or animals, or the sheltering of property,' see People v. Miller, supra (95 Cal.App.2d 631, 213 P.2d 534, 536).' (at p. 562) This is a proper definition of the legislative intent when I.C. § 18-1401 was adopted also. There is no merit, therefore, to appellants' con......
-
Ash v. State
...the shelter of property; a structure. (Citing authorities.) * * *'' The Colorado Supreme Court, in the case of Sanchez v. People, 142 Colo. 58, 349 P.2d 561, 562, 78 A.L.R.2d 775, adopted a definition approved by the California courts when it '* * * we believe it was the legislative intent ......
-
Armintrout v. People
...carrying on of business therein, whether or not a person or animal is actually present.(Emphasis added). See also Sanchez v. People, 142 Colo. 58, 60, 349 P.2d 561, 562 (1960) (stating that all stationary structures within Colorado are within the term "building," so long as they are designe......
-
Smith v. State
...shelter of property; a structure. [Citing authorities.] * * * ' " The Colorado Supreme Court, in the case of Sanchez v. People, 142 Colo. 58, 349 P.2d 561, 562, 78 A.L.R.2d 775, adopted a definition approved by the California courts when it " * * * we believe it was the legislative intent t......