Sanchez v. Town of Brookhaven
| Decision Date | 21 October 1963 |
| Citation | 245 N.Y.S.2d 994,19 A.D.2d 864 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Jose SANCHEZ, Jr., Petitioner-Respondent, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, and Charles R. Dominy as Supervisor and as a member of the Board of said Town, Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Schmidt & Fechter, Patchogue, for appellant; James E. McGiff, Patchogue, of counsel.
Harold L. Herzstein, New York City, for respondent; Stanley Mailman, New York City, of counsel.
In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to annul the petitioner's discharge from his position of Buyer in the Town of Brookhaven, the Town and its officer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 30, 1962, which granted the application and reinstated petitioner, effective nunc pro tunc as of January 31, 1962, to his position as a permanent employee, with compensation to be paid from said date. Appellants' brief concedes that petitioner's probationary term was eight weeks. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Sup., 232 N.Y.S.2d 238.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Albano v. Kirby
...the Rules of the Suffolk County Civil Service Commission (Matter of Sanches v. Town of Brookhaven, Sup., 232 N.Y.S.2d 238, affd. 19 A.D.2d 864, 245 N.Y.S.2d 994). The early probationary appointments were for a single definite time and, in People ex rel. Kastor v. Kearny, supra, 164 N.Y. p. ......
-
Pastore v. City of Troy
...XIV[5]; see also, 4 NYCRR 4.5[a][5][iii]; Matter of Sanchez v. Town of Brookhaven, 232 N.Y.S.2d 238, 239, affd. 19 A.D.2d 864, 245 N.Y.S.2d 994). While petitioner is entitled to reinstatement, he is not entitled to back pay unless his dismissal was made in bad faith or was unconstitutionall......
-
Haynes v. Chautauqua County
...the Rules of Suffolk County Civil Service Commission (Matter of Sanches v. Town of Brookhaven, (Sup.) 232 N.Y.S.2d 238, affd. 19 A.D.2d 864, (245 N.Y.S.2d 994)). The early probationary appointments were for a single definite time and, in People ex rel. Kastor v. Kearny (supra, (164 N.Y.) p.......
- Lasker v. Moreida