Sanders State Bank v. Hawkins
Decision Date | 07 December 1911 |
Citation | 142 S.W. 84 |
Parties | SANDERS STATE BANK v. HAWKINS et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Bowie County; P. A. Turner, Judge.
Action by the Sanders State Bank against W. E. Hawkins and another. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Hart, Mahaffey & Thomas, for appellant. Jewel P. Lightfoot, Atty. Gen., Jno. W. Brady, Asst. Atty. Gen., A. S. Hawkins, and Wm. E. Hawkins, for appellees.
The appellant brought this suit against the appellees to recover damages which it claims to have sustained by reason of the closing of its banking house and the suspending of its banking operations by the appellees, while they were claiming to act under the law regulating state banks and trust companies. The petition alleges that the appellant was duly incorporated under the laws of Texas, during the year 1909, as a state bank; that it thereafter received a permit from the proper authority to engage in the banking business with its domicile and place of business in De Kalb, Bowie county, Tex.; that it had a paid-up capital stock of $10,000. The petition then proceeds as follows:
The appellees, defendants below, urged a general demurrer to this petition, which was by the court sustained. The plaintiff declined to amend, and the cause was dismissed, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
It appears to be conceded by counsel for appellant that the appellees were quasi judicial officers, and that their conduct in closing the bank must be regarded as having been performed while purporting to act in that capacity. In order to render a judicial or quasi judicial officer personally liable in a private action for damages resulting from his official conduct, it must appear that he transcended the limits of his power. As long as he remains within the scope of his legal authority, his motive is immaterial. Rains v. Simpson, 50 Tex. 495, 32 Am. Rep. 609; McVea v. Walker, 11 Tex. Civ. App. 46, 31 S. W. 839; Taylor v. Goodrich, 25 Tex. Civ. App. 109, 40 S. W. 515; Anderson v. Roberts, 35 S. W. 416; Throop on Public Off. § 713, and numerous cases cited in note. The case of Rains v. Simpson, supra, was one in which a sheriff sued the members of the county court for maliciously refusing to approve his bond as tax collector. After discussing the facts alleged in the petition and holding that they were insufficient to constitute a cause of action, the court said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cisco & N. E. Ry. Co. v. Diefenderfer
...Hurst v. Crawford (Tex. Civ. App.) 216 S. W. 284; Ferguson Seed Farms v. McMillan (Tex. Civ. App.) 296 S. W. 904; Sanders State Bank v. Hawkins (Tex. Civ. App.) 142 S. W. 84; Wall v. Royal Indemnity Ins. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 299 S. W. 319; Gray v. Osborne, 24 Tex. 157, 76 Am. Dec. 99; Sneed......
-
State ex rel. Funk v. Turner
... ... 607; ... Kroger v. Garkie, 274 S.W. 481; Deatsch v ... Fairfield, 233 P. 887; Sanders State Bank v ... Hawkins, 142 S.W. 84; Breese v. Bramwell, 110 ... Ore. 105; Fusz v ... ...
-
Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Brightman
...erroneous conclusion uninfluenced by malice or corruption cannot be the basis of an action for damages. In Sanders State Bank v. Hawkins et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 142 S. W. 84, 88, a bank commissioner was sued for damages arising out of an alleged wrongful act in closing a bank, under a provi......
-
Font v. Carr
...commissioner's court were absolutely immune for refusing to accept the sheriff's bond as ex-officio tax collector); Sanders State Bank v. Hawkins, 142 S.W. 84, 86 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1911, no writ) (holding commissioner of insurance and banking and bank examiner were absolutely immune ......