Sanders v. Sheets
Decision Date | 06 July 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 95724.,95724. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | SANDERS v. SHEETS. |
Appeal from Circuit Court. Jackson County; A. C. Southern, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Thomas J. Sanders against R. G. Sheets. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Henry S. Conrad, L. E. Durham, and Spurgeon L. Smithson, all of Kansas City, for appellant.
Ashley & Gilbert, of Kansas City, for respondent.
This is a suit in equity to recover the sum of $500, part payment on a contract for the sale of real estate entered into between plaintiff and defendant, and to have said payment declared a lien against the said real estate.
The contract of sale, made in the usual form of real estate contract obtaining in the city of Kansas City, Mo., was executed on April 15, 1924, and signed, in the name of defendant, "by Square Deal Realty & Loan Company," and by plaintiff in person. The contract, in so far as material to the issues in this suit, provides:
The petition is formal and alleges the execution of the contract (making same an exhibit and part of said petition by reference), and alleges that, pursuant to the terms of said contract, plaintiff paid to defendant the sum of $500 in cash, by depositing same with the Square Deal Realty & Loan Company; that defendant failed to make a good title to the property described as the east 62½ feet of lot 1, block 2, Oakland, an addition to Kansas City, Mo., as shown by the recorded plat thereof, so that same cannot be conveyed to defendant by warranty deed free from all liens and incumbrances, except as in the contract provided, for the reason that the apartment building on said property extends several inches into a public alley on the east side of said apartment, as shown by the evidence; that on May 21, 1924, plaintiff specified said objection, in writing, delivered to defendant at the office of the Square Deal Realty & Loan Company, as provided in the contract; that the 30 days allowed defendant to correct said defect and make good the title to said real estate have elapsed, and said defects have not been rectified; alleges demand has been made on defendant for refunding said $500, part payment, but this demand has been refused.
The answer is a general denial. The cause was tried to the court, resulting in a decree and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $500 and 6 per cent. interest from June 21, 1924, in the sum of $37.92, and providing:
Motions for a new trial and in arrest ware unavailing, and defendant has appealed.
There is no dispute as to the material facts in the case, and this appeal hinges upon a construction of the contract. In support of his appeal, defendant urges that under the contract the Square Deal Realty & Loan Company was a trustee, or stakeholder, with respect to the handling of the deposit money, and that neither party could hold the other for the acts of said trustee or stakeholder. Defendant, in support of his contention, leans heavily on the opinion of this court in the case of Martin v. Allen, 125 Mo. App. 633, 103 S. W. 138, and, also, on Coble v. Denisen, 151 Mo. App....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis v. Ralston-Purina Co.
... ... Groghan v. Savings Trust Co., 231 ... Mo.App. 1161, 85 S.W.2d 239; John Deere Plow Co. v ... Gooch, 230 Mo.App. 167, 91 S.W.2d 145; Sanders v ... Sheets, 287 S.W. 1069; 12 Am. Juris. 557, Contracts, ... sec. 65. (2) A contract will not be construed so as to ... require one of the ... ...
-
Creason v. Harding
... ... Berthold, 247 S.W. 219; Buhler Mill Co ... v. Jolly, 261 S.W. 353, 217 Mo.App. 240; Brown v ... Houghton Const. Co., 227 S.W. 137; Sanders v. Sheets, ... 287 S.W. 1069 ... James ... P. Aylward, Harding, Murphy & Tucker and R. C ... Tucker for John T. Harding ... ...
-
John Deere Plow Co. v. Cooper
... ... v. Berthold & Jennings Lumber Co. (Mo ... App.), 247 S.W. 219; Buhler Mill & Elevator Co. v ... Jolly, 217 Mo.App. 240, 261 S.W. 353; Sanders v ... Sheets (Mo. App.), 287 S.W. 1069.] ... We ... refrain from ruling on the question as to whether the trial ... court was ... ...
-
State ex rel. and to Use of Alport v. Boyle-Pryor Const. Co.
... ... Co. v. Berthold & Jennings Lbr. Co., ... 247 S.W. 219; Buhler Mill & Elevator Co. v. Jolly, ... 217 Mo.App. 240, 261 S.W. 353; Sanders v. Sheets, ... 287 S.W. 1069. (12) The appellant's contract looks toward ... future services. The reference to past work in estimating the ... ...