Sanders v. State
Decision Date | 21 April 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 63454,63454 |
Citation | 162 Ga.App. 175,290 S.E.2d 516 |
Parties | SANDERS v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Edward Lang, Decatur, for appellant.
Robert Wilson, Dist. Atty., Susan Brooks, Asst. Dist. Atty., Decatur, for appellee.
Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the offense of motor vehicle theft in two counts, the first offense occurring May 1, 1978, and the second on July 12, 1978, both automobiles allegedly stolen being the property of the same automobile dealer with whom this defendant was connected in some capacity. Defendant was sentenced to serve a term of seven years on each count to run consecutively. A motion for new trial was thereafter filed, amended and denied. The defendant appeals, the same being an out of time appeal ordered by the direction of a habeas corpus court based upon defendant's contentions that he was afforded ineffective assistance of counsel during the appellate process as he had instructed his retained counsel to appeal his case which counsel failed to do. Held :
The sole enumeration of error is that "[t]he trial court erred in charging the jury on a request to recharge that they would be required to deliberate (or to remain in the jury room) until they reached a verdict." The substance of the events surrounding this contended error apparently concerned a number of questions submitted by the jury inquiring certain things of the trial court. At that time (11:00 a. m. of the day of the trial) the court stated: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marshall v. State
...is enough evidence in this case for you to reach a verdict one way or another," were impermissibly coercive); Sanders v. State , 162 Ga. App. 175, 176-77, 290 S.E.2d 516 (1982) (holding that "instructing the jury that they would ‘just have to stay in there until you [reach a verdict]’ was t......
-
Brown v. State, 70369
...jurors so as to induce a decision contrary to the conscience of each. It simply was not of such character. Compare Sanders v. State, 162 Ga.App. 175, 290 S.E.2d 516 (1982). 2. Appellant next maintains that the trial court erred "in charging the jury that they could find venue in Fulton Coun......
-
Marshall v. State
... ... comments made during the Allen charge, especially ... the court's statement that "I feel like there is ... enough evidence in this case for you to reach a verdict one ... way or another," were impermissibly coercive); ... Sanders v. State , 162 Ga.App. 175, 176-77 (290 ... S.E.2d 516) (1982) (holding that "instructing the jury ... that they would 'just have to stay in there until you ... [reach a verdict]' was tantamount to charging that even ... in the event of any conscientious and irreconcilable ... ...
-
Watson v. State
...of the appellant's obviously absurd contention that the trial court rushed the jury into reaching a verdict. Compare Sanders v. State, 162 Ga.App. 175, 290 S.E.2d 516 (1982). When the jury indicated that no verdict had been reached during that additional fifteen-minute period of deliberatio......