Sandford v. Metcalfe

Decision Date25 September 2008
Citation958 A.2d 160,289 Conn. 931
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesIrene SANDFORD v. Watson B. METCALFE et al. Gretchen Pulvermann, Executrix (Estate of Mary Jane Watson) v. Watson B. Metcalfe et al.

Daniel W. Moger, Jr., and Joyce H. Young, Greenwich, in support of the petition.

James A. Fulton, Greenwich, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn.App. 162, 954 A.2d 188 (2008), is denied.

ROGERS, C.J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Bolat v. Bolat
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • August 8, 2017
    ...a question of law requiring our plenary review. See Sandford v. Metcalfe, 110 Conn.App. 162, 168, 954 A.2d 188, cert. denied, 289 Conn. 931, 958 A.2d 160 (2008); see also Gurski v. Rosenblum & Filan, LLC, Conn. 257, 266, 885 A.2d 163 (2005). FACTUAL FINDINGS The Court finds that the followi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT