Sandpebble Builders, Inc. v. Mansir

Decision Date20 December 2011
Citation2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 09303,936 N.Y.S.2d 215,90 A.D.3d 888
PartiesSANDPEBBLE BUILDERS, INC., appellant, v. Deborah MANSIR, et al., respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 09303
90 A.D.3d 888
936 N.Y.S.2d 215

SANDPEBBLE BUILDERS, INC., appellant,
v.
Deborah MANSIR, et al., respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Dec. 20, 2011.


[936 N.Y.S.2d 215]

Esseks, Hefter & Angel, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Theodore D. Sklar, Stephen R. Angel, and Nancy Silverman of counsel), for appellant.

Pinks, Arbeit & Nemeth, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Jonathan Lipshie of counsel and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP [Bernard J. Garbutt III and Shana R. Cappell], former of counsel on the brief), for respondents.

[936 N.Y.S.2d 216]

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., L. PRISCILLA HALL, PLUMMER E. LOTT, SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

[90 A.D.3d 888] In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), entered October 22, 2009, which granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) as time-barred.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, based upon allegations that the defendant Deborah Mansir, formerly the President of the Board of Education of the defendant East Hampton Union Free School District (hereinafter the School Board), misrepresented her authority to sign a contract on behalf of the East Hampton Union Free [90 A.D.3d 889] School District (hereinafter the School District) by signing the contract despite knowledge of her lack of authority to do so. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) as time-barred. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendants' motion. The plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

An action based in tort against a school district or a board of education, or an officer of a board of education acting within the scope of his or her duties, is subject to the time limits for commencement of an action set forth in General Municipal Law § 50–i(1) ( see Education Law § 3813[2] ). General Municipal Law § 50–i(1) prohibits an action based on tort against municipal and school district defendants unless the action is commenced no later than one year and 90 days “after the happening of the event upon which the claim is based” (General Municipal Law § 50–i[1] ). Since the “happening of the event” upon which the plaintiff bases its claims is Mansir's April 2002 act of misrepresenting her authority to sign a contract by signing the contract,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Manon v. Pons
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 18, 2015
    ...of claim bars state claims against individual defendants sued in their official capacities."); Sandpebble Builders, Inc. v. Mansir, 90 A.D.3d 888, 889, 936 N.Y.S.2d 215 (2d Dep't 2011) ; see also N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law §§ 50–e, 50–i. A notice of claim is not, however, a condition precedent to s......
  • House of Spices (India), Inc. v. SMJ Servs., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 27, 2013
    ...532, 881 N.Y.S.2d 651, 909 N.E.2d 573;Shalik v. Hewlett Assoc., L.P., 93 A.D.3d 777, 778, 940 N.Y.S.2d 304;Sandpebble Bldrs., Inc. v. Mansir, 90 A.D.3d 888, 889, 936 N.Y.S.2d 215). Here, because the action was commenced against SMJ on December 16, 2009, the fraud cause of action was timely ......
  • Harrington v. Cnty. of Suffolk
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 30, 2013
    ...without merit ( see Klein v. City of Yonkers, 53 N.Y.2d 1011, 1013, 442 N.Y.S.2d 477, 425 N.E.2d 865;Sandpebble Bldrs., Inc. v. Mansir, 90 A.D.3d 888, 889, 936 N.Y.S.2d 215;Greco v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 66 A.D.3d at 836–837, 886 N.Y.S.2d 615;Jensen v. City of New York, 288 A.D.2d ......
  • Gold Circle Fin., LLC v. GC Sandton Acquisition, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 21, 2017
    ...the date of the alleged misrepresentation which is relied upon by the plaintiff.") (internal citations omitted); Sandpebble Bldrs., Inc. v. Mansir, 90 A.D.3d 888 (2d Dept 2011) (same). Therefore, plaintiff had either until March 2015 under the six-year statute or February 2014 under the two......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT