Santi v. Zack Co., 73--164
| Decision Date | 18 December 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 73--164,73--164 |
| Citation | 287 So.2d 127 |
| Parties | Sam F. SANTI, Individually, and Santi Equipment Rentals, Inc., a Florida corporation, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. The ZACK COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Glazer & Glazer, Miami, for appellants.
Friedman, Britton & Stettin, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants' motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App.1971, 252 So.2d 817.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Dimick v. Ray
...498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), Designers Tile International Corp. v. Capitol C Corp., 499 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and Santi v. Zack Co., 287 So.2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), all cited in the trial court's order, amendments were not allowed which proposed to add new and different causes of action......
-
Bldg. B1, LLC v. Component Repair Servs., Inc.
...this newly-advanced theory. See Designers Tile Int'l Corp. v. Capitol C Corp., 499 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) ; Santi v. Zack Co., 287 So.2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).224 So.3d 790Finally, Building B1 asserts that the trial court erred in finding in favor of CRS on its counterclaim and in find......