Sapp v. State, 85-862
| Decision Date | 30 March 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 85-862,85-862 |
| Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 845,522 So.2d 1006 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 845 Larry SAPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, Judge.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Bartmon, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
UPON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND CLARIFICATION
It appears that this court entered its opinion on April 2, 1986, 489 So.2d 59, and thereafter, upon consideration of the above styled motion, this court stayed proceedings pending a decision in the Florida Supreme Court concerning a certified question in Hall v. State, 470 So.2d 796 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We are now advised that the Supreme Court has entered its opinion in Hall v. State, which opinion is reported at 517 So.2d 678 (Fla.1988). In light of these circumstances, we do the following:
1. We withdraw the court's opinion dated April 2, 1986.
2. We reverse the conviction of Larry Sapp for possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense under Section 790.07(2), Florida Statutes (1983) and remand with instructions to dismiss such charge.
3. We affirm the conviction of Larry Sapp for robbery with a firearm under Sections 812.13(1) and (2)(a), Florida Statutes (1983).
4. We reverse the sentencing order of the trial court which sentenced Larry Sapp as an adult and exceeded the guidelines. We remand with directions to resentence Larry Sapp for the charge on which he was convicted, giving due consideration to the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), and if adult sanctions are again imposed, to make the required findings in writing. Furthermore, the new sentence shall be within the sentencing guidelines, or else, the trial court shall enter a written order setting out reasons under the law for any deviation from the guidelines.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. State
...DCA 1989); Cherry v. State, 540 So.2d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Prescott v. State, 529 So.2d 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Sapp v. State, 522 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Reaching the conclusion that the defendant in this case cannot be convicted of both the underlying felony offense of aggrav......
-
Brown v. State, 88-983
...3d DCA 1988); Brown v. State, 529 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Prescott v. State, 529 So.2d 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Sapp v. State, 522 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Contra, Teemer v. State, 531 So.2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Clark v. State, 530 So.2d 519 (Fla. 5th DCA See also Bogard ......
- Cruise v. Graham, 92-0895
-
Neal v. State, 87-2061
...524 So.2d 738 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (robbery with a deadly weapon and display of a weapon during commission of a felony); Sapp v. State, 522 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal This case is remanded with directions tha......