Sarasota County v. General Development Corp., 75--77

Decision Date14 January 1976
Docket NumberNo. 75--77,75--77
Citation325 So.2d 45
PartiesSARASOTA COUNTY, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation doing business in the State of Florida, and the City of North Port, Florida, an incorporated municipality of the State of Florida, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard E. Nelson, Nelson, Payne, Hesse & Cyril, Sarasota, for appellant.

William C. Strode, Strode, Hereford & Taylor, Sarasota, for appellee Gen. Development Corp.

James H. Thompson, Thompson & Geithman, Englewood, for appellee City of North Port, Fla.

James D. Whisenand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, as amicus curiae for The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Appellant, Sarasota County (County), timely appeals an order dismissing its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief filed against appellees, General Development Corporation (GDC) and the City of North Port (City).

The complaint alleged that GDC was contemplating a certain land development known as Myakka Estates, lying entirely within the City and situate in the County, which constituted a "Development of regional impact," as defined in Fla.Stat. § 380.06 (1973). GDC had obtained from the City an order approving the development. The County complained of improprieties in the procedures followed in obtaining the City's approval under § 380.06, and alleged that it was attempting to appeal this order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. The complaint also asserted that GDC had recorded plats of its subdivision without the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Sarasota County.

The complaint contained four prayers for relief, to wit: (1) a judgment declaring that GDC and the City had not complied with the requirements of Chapter 380 with regard to the approval of Myakka Estates as a development of regional impact, (2) a judgment declaring the County's right to appeal the order of approval to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, (3) a judgment that GDC had violated certain general and local laws concerning the recording of subdivision plats, and (4) an injunction prohibiting construction or sale of lots in the subdivision unless the plats are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter for the reason:

. . . that the Plaintiff, SARASOTA COUNTY, is not a proper party to file an appeal to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, pursuant to Section 380.07 of the Florida Statutes and finds that in any event said plaintiff has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, since the appeal is still pending. . . .

With respect to the appeal from an order of a local government concerning a development of regional impact, Fla.Stat. § 380.07(2) provides:

. . . Within thirty days after the order is rendered, either the owner, developer, an appropriate regional planning agency, or the state land planning agency may appeal the order to the Florida land and water adjudicatory commission by filing a notice of appeal with the commission. . . .

This statute was recently construed by the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Beker Phosphate Corp. v. Muirhead
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 13, 1978
    ...Commission. Sarasota County v. Beker Phosphate Corporation, 322 So.2d 655 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1975). See also Sarasota County v. General Development Corp., 325 So.2d 45 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1976). Plaintiffs then brought this suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida a......
  • Friends of Everglades, Inc. v. Board of County Com'rs of Monroe County
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 1984
    ...1st DCA 1983); Sarasota County v. Department of Administration, 350 So.2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Sarasota County v. General Development Corporation, 325 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). See also Finnell, supra at 378; Pelham, State Land-Use Planning and Regulation at 54-56 (1979) [Pelham ]. Ap......
  • General Elec. Credit Corp. of Georgia v. Metropolitan Dade County
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 1977
    ...mistakenly relied upon Sarasota County v. Beker Phosphate Corp., 322 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and Sarasota County v. General Development Corp., 325 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). In both cases, Sarasota County sought to directly appeal development orders to the Adjudicatory Commission w......
  • Sarasota County v. Department of Administration, 77-159
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 5, 1977
    ...under Chapter 380. See Sarasota County v. Beker Phosphate Corp., 322 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Sarasota County v. General Development Corp., 325 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). 8 Cf. Pinellas County v. Lake Padgett Pines, 333 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA In summary, we are not blind to the laud......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT