Sargent v. Brown, 76073

Decision Date21 April 1988
Docket NumberNo. 76073,76073
Citation186 Ga.App. 890,368 S.E.2d 826
PartiesSARGENT et al. v. BROWN.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

E. Harold Stone, for appellants.

Steven E. Marcus, Decatur, Thomas M. Butler, Conyers, for appellee.

POPE, Judge.

Claimant in this workers' compensation case was injured on August 24, 1984 when he cut his left wrist and arm while using a chainsaw to cut timber. Claimant's employer accepted the accident as compensable and began paying workers' compensation benefits. Benefits continued to be paid until August 1986 when, at the behest of the employer, an interlocutory order was issued suspending the payment of benefits based upon claimant's refusal to cooperate with medical treatment.

At the hearing subsequent to the issuance of the order, claimant testified that he had failed to keep appointments with his treating physician because he had been incarcerated during the period in question. Further testimony revealed that claimant was incarcerated because he allegedly violated his probation by committing another crime; however, it was subsequently determined that claimant had been falsely accused of committing this crime and all charges against him were dismissed and he was released from custody. Pursuant to this testimony, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) "found that the claimant did not keep an appointment with [his treating physician] due to his incarceration on a criminal charge which has not been prosecuted, [and hence found] that the claimant's refusal to cooperate was not unreasonable ...," and ordered that claimant be paid benefits for the time he was incarcerated. The State Board of Workers' Compensation and Superior Court of Dooly County affirmed the ALJ's award.

The only issue for resolution on appeal is whether the ALJ erred in holding that the claimant was entitled to receive benefits during the period of his incarceration based on the holding in Howard v. Scott Housing Systems, 180 Ga.App. 690(2), 350 S.E.2d 27 (1986). In Howard, we considered a similar issue and found that the claimant in that case was justified in refusing suitable employment which was offered to him while he was incarcerated but before he was adjudicated guilty. On certiorari, the Supreme Court agreed and held that "[i]n workers' compensation cases where the employee is charged with a crime while receiving benefits, ... the proper time for termination of benefits is the date of adjudication of guilt." Scott Housing Systems v. Howard, 256 Ga....

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Richardson, 75830
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 21 Abril 1988
  • Mize v. Cleveland Exp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 5 Marzo 1990
    ...Howard v. Scott Housing Systems, 180 Ga.App. 690, 350 S.E.2d 27 (1986), and has since been more broadly applied. See Sargent v. Brown, 186 Ga.App. 890, 368 S.E.2d 826 (1988). Since the appellant in the instant case was receiving his benefits at the time he was charged with a crime, his bene......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT