Sarron v. Crawford, 85-320
Decision Date | 05 March 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 85-320,85-320 |
Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 563,464 So.2d 644 |
Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 563 Alex SARRON, Petitioner, v. Fred CRAWFORD, As Director of The Dade County Jail, Respondent. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
John Lipinski, Miami, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Diane Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Where, as here, there is neither an affirmative finding nor evidence in the record that the petitioner, at the time of his incarceration for civil contempt, had the ability to pay the amount ordered and thus obtain his release from incarceration, the incarceration, the aim of which is to coerce future compliance with the court's order, is unlawful, see Bowen v. Bowen, 454 So.2d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Ponder v. Ponder, 438 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 887 (Fla.1984), and the petition for writ of habeas corpus must be granted. This ruling is without prejudice to the commencement of any appropriate criminal contempt proceeding to punish the petitioner for his willful violation of the court order which occurred well before the petitioner's incarceration.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pompey v. Cochran
...present ability to pay purge amount, relying on Bowen ); Smith v. Felton, 654 So.2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (same); Sarron v. Crawford, 464 So.2d 644, 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) ("Where ... there is neither an affirmative finding nor evidence in the record that the petitioner, at the time of his......
-
Bajcar v. Bajcar
...is intended not to "punish" past conduct but to coerce future compliance. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985) ; Sarron v. Crawford, 464 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). In other words, civil contempt is prospective, seeking to compel the contemnor to comply with an existing court order ......
-
Bajcar v. Bajcar
...intended not to "punish" past conduct but to coerce future compliance. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985); Sarron v. Crawford, 464 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). In other words, civil contempt is prospective, seeking to compel the contemnor to comply with an existing court order or......
-
LeNeve v. Navarro, 90-1747
...from custody, although without prejudice to the commencement of any appropriate criminal contempt proceeding, see Sarron v. Crawford, 464 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), or further civil contempt ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur. ...