Saul v. Southern Seating & Cabinet Co.

Decision Date09 November 1909
Docket Number1,874.
Citation65 S.E. 1065,6 Ga.App. 843
PartiesSAUL et al. v. SOUTHERN SEATING & CABINET CO.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

When one person has sold and delivered goods to another, and the detriments and benefits which constituted the consideration of the contract between them have been suffered and received and the transaction has thus become fixed as to the reciprocal liabilities, a contract by a third person, not originally bound, to pay the debt thus already pre-existing and incurred by the purchaser is nudum pactum, unless supported by some new consideration.

A note under seal, and not on its face disclosing any principal for whom the signers could be construed to be acting, is to be taken as their individual act; and the words "Pres." and "Secy.," following their respective names, as mere descriptio personæ.

Error from City Court of Atlanta; H. M. Reid, Judge.

Action by the Southern Seating & Cabinet Company against J. Saul and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Reversed.

The Southern Seating & Cabinet Company brought suit against J Saul and Nathan Wolfe on three promissory notes, all of the same tenor, except that one was due two months, one four months, and one six months after date. It will be sufficient to copy the material parts of only one of them, viz "$250.00. Atlanta, Ga., Aug. 13, 1907. For value received, two months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Southern Seating & Cabinet Co. two hundred and fifty dollars, without interest. The consideration of this and other notes is the following described property: 705 #404 Body--116 #40 Ends 18 Donkey Division which we have received of said Southern Seating & Cabinet Co. Nevertheless, it is understood and agreed by and between us and the said Southern Seating & Cabinet Co. that the title to the above-mentioned property does not pass to us, and that until all said notes are paid the title to the aforesaid property shall remain in the said Southern Seating & Cabinet Co., who shall have the right, in case of nonpayment at maturity of either of said notes, without process of law, to enter and retake, and may enter and retake, immediate possession of the said property wherever it may be, and remove the same. *** the drawer and indorsers agree to pay all reasonable attorney's fees for collecting the same. J. Saul, Pres. Nathan F. Wolfe, Secy."

The defendants filed a plea as follows: "That at the time of signing said notes J. Saul was the president of the Congregation of Beth Israel and Nathan F. Wolfe was the secretary of said Congregation. Said Congregation is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Georgia for religious and charitable purposes. That on May 21, 1907 said Congregation of Beth Israel, through its purchasing committee, to wit, J. Saul and L. Eplan, entered into an agreement with the Southern Seating & Cabinet Company, of Jackson, Tenn., for the purchase of a lot of seats and benches to be used in the church building of said Congregation of Beth Israel. The purchase price for said benches agreed to be paid by said Congregation of Beth Israel, through its purchasing committee, was the sum of $1,000, of which $250 was to be paid cash when the goods were placed in said church building. The balance of said payments were to be in three equal payments, to wit, in 60 days and 4 and 6 months, without interest. Said contract was in writing, and was executed between the Southern Seating & Cabinet Company, of the first part, and J. Saul and L. Eplan, purchasing committee of the Congregation of Beth Israel, of the second part. Said contract further provided that the Southern Seating & Cabinet Company should deliver and set up the benches purchased, and upon their acceptance by the Congregation were to be paid for by the Congregation as follows: $250 in cash and the balance in three equal payments in 60 days and 4 and 6 months, without interest. That when said benches were shipped to Atlanta, and set up in the church building of said Congregation of Beth Israel, the representative of said plaintiff came to Atlanta with the contract and three certain notes made out on forms provided by said plaintiff, and, claiming to have fully performed its part of the contract, called on said Congregation of Beth Israel for the cash payment and for the three notes representing the deferred payment, in pursuance of and in accordance with the said contract. That said Congregation thereupon made the cash payment and directed defendants, as president and secretary of said Congregation, to sign the notes tendered by said plaintiff. That defendants, in accordance with the direction of said Congregation, and at the request of said plaintiff, and as officers of said Congregation, and in no other capacity, signed their names to the said notes--J. Saul as president, and Nathan F. Wolfe as Secretary. That at the time said notes were so signed by defendants there was no promise on the part of defendants to become personally liable for the obligation of said Congregation. There was no demand made on the defendants by said plaintiff that they should become personally liable, and said notes, when signed by the defendants, were accepted by said plaintiff as the obligation of said Congregation of Beth Israel. That there was no consideration moving to the defendants as individuals for signing said obligations, and that as to defendants as individuals said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Hoffman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Company
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 26 Enero 1914
    ...case they were partners and that fact proved. 29 Ark. 512. The notes were without consideration and are void. 7 Cyc. 701, and cases cited; 65 S.E. 1065; 29 A. 3. Appellee is estopped to assert a claim as against appellant. 17 Cyc. 787, and cases cited. Appellee, pro se. 1. There is no suffi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT