Saunders v. Brock
Decision Date | 31 October 1867 |
Citation | 30 Tex. 421 |
Parties | WILLIAM E. SAUNDERS v. JOHN BROCK. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
A verbal understanding about an account which existed anterior to the note cannot be proved, so as to entitle the defendant to a credit, unless he also prove that there was mistake as to the true amount of his indebtedness for which he executed his note.
ERROR from Guadalupe. The case was tried before Hon. R. L. WADDELL, one of the district judges.
As there was no assignment of errors, there must have been a suggestion of delay, since the judge discusses the facts. Pas. Dig. art. 1591, note 618.
The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion.
No briefs have been furnished to the reporter.
In this case we can discover no error in the verdict and judgment in the district court. There is no assignment of errors in the record. The defendant sets up a defense in his answer which, if an exception had been taken to it by the plaintiff in the court below (except as to $21), which the answer alleges was embraced in the note sued on by mistake, would have been stricken out by the court by a proper ruling.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chalk v. Daggett
...both the absolute obligations to pay and the definite dates of payment, and would therefore have no effect upon the writings. Saunders v. Brock, 30 Tex. 421; Shaw v. Lumpkin (Tex. Civ. App.) 241 S. W. 220; Key v. Hickman (Tex. Civ. App.) 149 S. W. 275; Security Life Ins. Co. v. Allen (Tex. ......
-
Kuper v. Schmidt
...written instrument to pay a sum certain in money on a fixed future date. Chalk v. Daggett, Tex.Com.App., 257 S.W. 228. See also Saunders v. Brock, 30 Tex. 421; Crumpler v. Humphries, Tex.Civ.App., 218 S.W.2d 215 (wr. ref.); Shaw v. Lumpkin, Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W. 220 (no Defendants rely upo......
-
Cameron v. Williams
...the action of the court was correct, and the assignment is in all things overruled. Newton v. Newton, 77 Tex. 512, 14 S. W. 157; Saunders v. Brock, 30 Tex. 421; Leavell v. Seale, 45 S. W. 171; Ablowich v. Greenville National Bank, 22 Tex. Civ. App. 272, 54 S. W. 794; Bailey v. Rockwall Coun......
- Eliot v. Whitaker