Savannah Electric Co v. Lowe
Decision Date | 23 August 1921 |
Docket Number | (No. 11760.) |
Citation | 27 Ga.App. 350,108 S.E. 313 |
Parties | SAVANNAH ELECTRIC CO. v. LOWE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED]
Error from City Court of Savannah; Davis Freeman, Judge.
Action by Genevive Lowe against the Savannah Electric Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.
Lawrence & Abrahams, of Savannah, for plaintiff in error.
Oliver & Oliver, of Savannah, for defendant in error.
JENKINS, J. P. [1-7] The plaintiff was a passenger of the defendant street railway company. She brought suit for damages on account of her alleged unlawful arrest by the conductor of the defendant company. The company entered a plea of justification based on the ground that the plaintiff had violated the regulations pertaining to the separation of the races. No objection was made as to the sufficiency of the plea of justification, but the case was tried upon the theory set up by a defense of that character. The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $537, and the defendant company brought its exceptions to this court.
This section manifestly does not apply, however, to street cars. These are dealt with in the next section (section 2718), which provides:
"All conductors or other employees in charge of such cars shall be required to assign all passengers to their respective cars, or compartments of cars, provided by the said companies under the provisions of the preceding section; and all conductors of dummy, electric, and street cars shall be required, and are hereby empowered, to assign all passengers to seats on the cars under their charge, so as to separate the white and colored races as much as practicable; and all conductors and other employees of railroads and all conductors of dummy, electric, and street cars shall have, and are hereby invested with, police powers to carry out said provisions."
For a failure to obey the requirements of this section passengers are penalized by section 2719, as follows:
"Any passenger remaining in any car, or compartment, or seat, other than that to which he may have been assigned, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor."
The court on the trial gave in charge to the jury these two latter sections of the Code, and also the rule of the railroad commission of Georgia quoted in the fourth headnote, to the effect that conductors of the Savannah Electric Company should require "colored passengers, beginning with the first seat in the rear, to occupy such seat to its capacity before taking the next seat in front, and so on." The plaintiff in her petition pleaded certain municipal ordinances of Savannah, the provisions of which she contended had been violated by the defendant company. These ordinances were read in the presence of the jury, without objection, and were treated in the charge of the court as indicated in the syllabus. They read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kennebrew v. State
...defendant wrote on and showed jury was evidence although not introduced in the usual and regular way); Savannah Electric Co. v. Lowe, 27 Ga.App. 350(5)(a), 108 S.E. 313 (1921) (evidence not formally tendered but read to court in presence of jury treated as though it was tendered into eviden......
-
Park v. State, 24588
...that the court considered the sheet of paper that the defendant wrote his name on as being evidence,' citing Savannah Electric Company v. Lowe, 27 Ga.App. 350(5a), 108 S.E. 313. In the latter case it held that where municipal ordinances were 'not formally tendered in evidence,' but were ple......
- Savannah Electric Co. v. Lowe