Scanlon v. United Cigar Stores Co.
Decision Date | 27 November 1917 |
Citation | 117 N.E. 840,228 Mass. 481 |
Parties | SCANLON v. UNITED CIGAR STORES CO. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Exceptions from Superior Court, Worcester County; Philip J. O'Connell, Judge.
Action by John Scanlon against the United Cigar Stores Company. There was verdict for plaintiff, and defendant excepts. Exceptions sustained, and judgment directed to be entered for defendant.
John F. McGrath, of Fitchburg, for plaintiff.
Chas. C. Milton and Frank L. Riley, both of Worcester, for defendant.
This is an action of tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for damages sustained by reason of a fall into an opening into which a condenser had been placed in the cellar occupied by the United Cigar Stores Company at the corner of Main and Pleasant streets in the city of Worcester. The facts are substantially as follows:
The defendant occupied a store and a cellar beneath the store where the plaintiff was injured. The Bay State Trucking Company under an arrangement with the defendant, on an average of once a week, on notice that the defendant had merchandise awaiting delivery, sent its teams to a freight office to get the merchandise and deliver it in the rear way of the defendant's store. The plaintiff was an employee of the trucking company. In the rear of the store there was a street passageway from which a door opened upon a water elevator operated by a rope; there was a bell on the left hand side of the elevator door way. The elevator descended about twelve to fifteen feet from the level of the passageway to the basement floor of the cellar. In the basement were two sheathing partitions: one set off from the elevator the cellar of the defendant, the other partitioned off the cellar of another tenant. Three or four feet from the elevator an ordinary panel door opened into the cellar of the defendant; this door was ordinarily kept locked by a bar on the inside. All merchandise received at the rear of the store was kept in the cellar. Where goods to be delivered were of some size, the customary way of delivery was to drive the team to the elevator in the passageway, ring the bell by the side of the elevator door, and then, if the bell did not attract anybody's attention or was out of order, to go around to the outside, up front and ask for the shipping clerk.
A witness called by the plaintiff testified:
On the day of the accident the plaintiff got a barrell from the freight depot and drove in the back alley; the elevator was not up when he got there. He testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Urban v. Central Massachusetts Elec. Co.
... ... 15 ... Guiney v ... Union Ice Co. 225 Mass. 279 ... Scanlon v. United ... Cigar Stores Co. 228 Mass. 481. Coulombe v. Horne ... Coal ... ...
-
Statkunas v. Louis Promboim & Son, Inc
...v. Hugh Nawn Construction Co., 206 Mass. 58, 61, 91 N. E. 886,31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 623,19 Ann. Cas. 424;Scanlon v. United Cigar Stores Co., 228 Mass. 481, 117 N. E. 840;Wojcik v. Cadillac Berkshire Co., 256 Mass. 317, 319, 320, 152 N. E. 326;Glaser v. Congregation Kehillath Israel, 263 Mass.......
-
Pope v. Willow Garages, Inc.
...218 Mass. 50, 105 N. E. 454, L. R. A. 1915B, 387;Graham v. Pocasset Mfg. Co., 220 Mass. 195, 107 N. E. 920;Scanlon v. United Cigar Stores Co., 228 Mass. 481, 117 N. E. 840;Lack v. McMahon, 254 Mass. 484, 150 N. E. 225. Serious question arises whether the plaintiff did not contribute to the ......
-
Smith v. Simon's Supply Co.
... ... 50 ... Graham v ... Pocasset Manuf. Co. 220 Mass. 195 , 196. Scanlon v ... United Cigar Stores Co. 228 Mass. 481 , 484. Herman ... v ... ...