Schager v. Durland
| Decision Date | 17 September 2001 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | ANNE L. SCHAGER et al., Respondents,<BR>v.<BR>DANFORTH DURLAND et al., Defendants, and RICHARD MARCUS et al., Appellants. |
Ritter, J. P., Altman, McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.
The injured plaintiff placed his physical and mental condition in controversy. The Supreme Court therefore erred in denying the appellants' motion (see, Prink v Rockefeller Ctr., 48 NY2d 309).
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
DeLouise v. S.K.I. Wholesale Beer Corp.
...106 Corona Realty Corp., 300 A.D.2d at 267, 750 N.Y.S.2d 764; Molesi v. Rubenstein, 294 A.D.2d 546, 742 N.Y.S.2d 881; Schager v. Durland, 286 A.D.2d 725, 730 N.Y.S.2d 455). ...
- Mulham v. City of New York
- Silver v. Apfel
- Rabinowitz v. City of New York