Schelb v. Sparenberg
Decision Date | 08 February 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 7372.,7372. |
Citation | 124 S.W.2d 322 |
Parties | SCHELB et al. v. SPARENBERG et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
H. S. Lattimore, Marvin B. Simpson, Leo Brewster, and Harris Brewster, all of Fort Worth, for plaintiffs in error.
Brown & Brown, Cantey, Hanger & McMahon and Gillis A. Johnson, all of Fort Worth, for defendants in error.
As we understand this record, it shows the following facts which are pertinent to this opinion:
During the year 1902, and for many years prior thereto, H. Sparenberg and his wife, Johanna Sparenberg, lived in the town of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas. In 1902 H. Sparenberg died, leaving a written will. Omitting formal parts, this will reads as follows:
It appears that the above will was duly admitted to probate in Howard County, Texas. It will be noted that the will constituted Mrs. Johanna Sparenberg independent executrix thereof. Mrs. Sparenberg offered the will for probate, accepted under it, and duly qualified as independent executrix thereof.
H. Sparenberg and his wife had three children, one daughter and two sons. The daughter is now Mrs. Lizzie Schelb, wife of P. J. Schelb. The Schelbs are plaintiffs in error here. The two sons were Charles and George Sparenberg. Charles died after his father, but before his mother, unmarried and without issue. George also died after his father, but before his mother. George left two sons, Charles and Russell Sparenberg. These two sons are therefore the grandsons of H. and Johanna Sparenberg.
Johanna Sparenberg died in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, in November, 1933, at the very advanced age of 94 years. At the time of her death Mrs. Johanna Sparenberg left as her only surviving heirs at law her daughter, Mrs. Lizzie Schelb, wife of P. J. Schelb, and the two grandsons above named.
At the time of her death Mrs. Johanna Sparenberg left a purported last written will. Omitting formal parts, this will reads as follows:
After the death of Mrs. Johanna Sparenberg, Mrs. Lizzie Schelb offered her will for probate in the County Court of Tarrant County, Texas, and same was there probated as her last will and testament. We assume that Mrs. Lizzie Schelb, who was named independent executrix of such will, duly qualified as such.
After the probate of Mrs. Johanna Sparenberg's will in Tarrant County, Texas, Charles and Russell Sparenberg, the two grandsons, filed a proceeding in the County Court of Tarrant County, Texas, to annul such will and its probate on the grounds, generally speaking, of undue influence alleged to have been practiced by Mrs. Lizzie Schelb and her husband, P. J. Schelb, over the testatrix, and want of testamentary capacity on the part of the testatrix. This case was duly tried in the County Court of Tarrant County, Texas, and resulted in a judgment sustaining the will and its probate. Charles and Russell Sparenberg appealed to the 17th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, and such appeal was duly docketed in that court.
It appears that before the above-described appeal was tried in the 17th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, Charles and Russell Sparenberg filed a civil action in such court against Lizzie Schelb and her husband, P. J. Schelb. We shall not attempt to detail the relief sought by this suit, except to state that it attempts to construe the will of H. Sparenberg, deceased, and, generally speaking, seeks an accounting and division of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Chase Manhattan Bank
...that it be given the construction that only the property owned by the testator was intended to pass thereunder." Schelb v. Sparenburg, 1939, 133 Tex. 17, 124 S.W. 2d 322, 326. See also Gulf C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Brandenburg, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. (4) Use of the first person singular pro......
-
Hassell v. Pruner
...bounty. Barksdale v. Dobbins, Tex.Civ.App., 141 S.W.2d 1035; Schelb v. Sparenberg, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 324, affirmed 133 Tex. 17, 124 S.W.2d 322. While the jury found that Abbie Evans had testamentary capacity it would have been justified in further finding and concluding under the fac......
-
Airline Motor Coaches v. Caver
...findings we must affirm the cause. Texas Power & Light Co. v. Doering Hotel Co., 139 Tex. 351, 162 S.W.2d 938(2); Schelb v. Sparenberg, 133 Tex. 17, 124 S.W.2d 322; Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. State, 122 Tex. 530, 62 S.W.2d 107; Merrell et ux. v. Timmons et al., 138 Tex. 250, 158 S.W.2d 278;......
-
McClure v. Bailey
...or explain the contents of the instrument." Judge Critz, speaking for the Supreme Court in the case of Schelb et al. v. Sparenberg et al., 133 Tex. 17, 124 S.W.2d 322, 326, point 4, "Finally, we hold that oral declarations of the testator, whether made at the time of executing the will or p......