Schienfeldt v. Norris

Decision Date04 March 1874
Citation115 Mass. 17
PartiesJoseph Schienfeldt v. Lawrence B. Norris
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Suffolk. Tort, to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in being run over by a wagon in charge of the defendant's servant in a public street, in the city of Boston. Trial in the Superior Court before Putnam, J., who after a verdict for the plaintiff, allowed the following bill of exceptions:

"The evidence introduced by the plaintiff to show ordinary care on his own part and negligence on the part of the defendant's servant, was as follows: The plaintiff testified: 'I keep store on Federal Street. On Friday September 8, 1871, at quarter past seven o'clock in the morning, I was going to my store and crossing Federal Street. I looked both ways, and had time to go through. A wagon going very fast knocked me down. The shaft hit me on the head and the back wheel went over me. I knew nothing till I was taken into the house.' Cross-examination. 'I looked up and down the street, both ways, before I undertook to cross, but saw no carriage. I could see a quarter of a mile up the street in the direction from which the wagon came. I saw the wagon at the same time it knocked me down. The street is paved. I did not hear the wagon nor the men. I was a few minutes crossing. I was right in the middle of the street, in the horse car track, when I was struck. I was moving, not standing still, looking straight ahead.'

"Dennis J. Callahan testified: 'I was at my store, 273 Federal Street, and saw the mail wagon coming with unusual speed. Saw the plaintiff crossing. The team struck him and knocked him down. The team went the length of this room before it stopped. I can't tell the rate of speed, but the wagon was going faster than usual. The plaintiff was almost in the middle of the street when I saw him, walking leisurely. Was going at an ordinary rate. I am certain he was not standing still when he was struck. The wagon was going pretty fast ten miles an hour. Have seen the same wagon every morning for a year and a half, and never saw it going so fast as on this occasion. After striking plaintiff, driver did not slacken his speed until after going the length of this court room. Did not hear the driver shout at all.' Cross-examined. 'I was near where the plaintiff crossed. I was two houses from there, and in the opposite direction from which the wagon was coming. The team was fifty yards up the street when I saw it coming. It did not make a great deal of noise. I can't tell how far I heard it.'

"James Dillon testified: 'I was hanging out things at my store on Federal Street when the plaintiff was run over. The wagon could be seen forty or fifty yards before it reached the plaintiff. I first saw it ten or fifteen yards from the place where the man was run over, and after the crowd had collected about him, heard nothing from the driver. The wagon did not stop less than forty or fifty yards from the same. It was going unusually fast.'

"James Mahan testified: 'I saw the accident. I was standing opposite East Street, looking down Federal Street. The team was coming pretty lively, eight or ten miles an hour. I saw the old man crossing. I don't suppose they saw him. I did not see him till he was hit. Wagon went about a hundred feet before it hauled up.' Cross-examined. 'I was on the sidewalk, twenty-five or thirty feet off. Saw the team come into Federal Street from Broad Street. I saw and heard it four hundred or five hundred feet off. There were other people crossing and passing, but there was no other carriage. The wagon was rattling considerable. Did not hear men cry out; the wagon made noise enough to drown their voices.'

"Phebe Schienfeldt testified: 'The driver told me he saw the plaintiff six feet off. I asked him if he could not turn his horse. He said it was not so easy.'

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Hennessey v. Taylor
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1905
    ... ... her recovery. Wrinn v. Jones, 111 Mass. 360; ... Williams v. Grealy, 112 Mass. 79; Schienfeldt v ... Norris, 115 Mass. 17; Carland v. Young, 119 ... Mass. 150; Bowser v. Wellington, 126 Mass. 391; ... Shapliegh v. Wyman, 134 Mass. 118; ... ...
  • Donovan v. Bernhard
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1911
    ... ... recovery if he is run over by a passing team.' Some of ... the cases that state this doctrine are Schienfeldt v ... Norris, 115 Mass. 17; Carland v. Young, 119 ... Mass. 150; Bowser v. Wellington, 126 Mass. 391; ... Shapleigh v. Wyman, 134 Mass. 118; Dorr ... ...
  • Shapleigh v. Wyman
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1883
    ...a want of due care on her part, which contributed or may have contributed to the accident. Williams v. Grealy, 112 Mass. 79. Schienfeldt v. Norris, 115 Mass. 17. she done so, it does not appear that she could have seen the vehicle by which she was injured, nor indeed that it was in Essex St......
  • Driscoll v. West End St. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1893
    ... ... is to use due and reasonable care, adapted to the ... circumstances and the place." See Norris v ... Saxton, (Suffolk, January, 1893,) 32 N.E. 954. The ... plaintiff cannot recover if he was guilty of negligence which ... contributed to the ... on as he is going is usually a practical question eminently ... fit for a jury to determine. Schienfeldt v. Norris, ... 115 Mass. 17; Wrinn v. Jones, 111 Mass. 360. In the ... present case we think the questions of due care on the part ... both of the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT