Schleif v. City of New York, 2008-05185.
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
| Citation | 60 A.D.3d 926,2009 NY Slip Op 02347,875 N.Y.S.2d 259 |
| Decision Date | 24 March 2009 |
| Parties | ALFRED SCHLEIF, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. |
| Docket Number | 2008-05185. |
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
[60 A.D.3d 927]
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cullen, J.), entered May 22, 2008, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon an order of the same court dated April 11, 2008, denying the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict and for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict and for judgment as a matter of law is granted, and the order is modified accordingly.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the City of New York to recover damages for injuries he allegedly sustained on October 1, 2004 when he fell after he stepped into a depression in the asphalt abutting a manhole cover and then caught his foot on the edge of the manhole cover. The depression and manhole were located in the middle of the College Point Municipal Parking Lot, a parking lot owned and maintained by the City. There is no allegation by the plaintiff that written notice of this defect was ever given to the City. Rather, the plaintiff's theory as to liability was that the special use exception applies to the facts of this case.
The trial court rejected the City's request to charge the jury with PJI 2:225A, which requires proof that the City received prior written notice of the defect in question. Instead, as the plaintiff requested, the court charged the jury with PJI 2:225, which does not require proof of such prior written notice. The verdict sheet given to the jury asked only two questions: first, was the City negligent, and second, if negligent, was that negligence a substantial factor in causing the accident. There was no question as to special use.
Upon the jury verdict, the City moved pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), inter alia, to set aside the verdict and to enter judgment in its favor. The Supreme Court denied the motion and entered an interlocutory judgment on the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiff and against the City. We reverse.
"Where, as here, a municipality has enacted a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dutka v. Odierno
...98 A.D.3d 1007, 951 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; De La Reguera v. City of Mount Vernon, 74 A.D.3d 1127, 904 N.Y.S.2d 108 ; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926, 875 N.Y.S.2d 259 ). "The only recognized exceptions to the statutory prior written notice requirement involve situations in which the muni......
-
Donadio v. City of N.Y., 2014-01725, 2014-08124
...98 A.D.3d 1007, 951 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; De La Reguera v. City of Mount Vernon, 74 A.D.3d 1127, 904 N.Y.S.2d 108 ; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926, 875 N.Y.S.2d 259 ). The Court of Appeals has recognized two exceptions to this rule: (1) 126 A.D.3d 853where the locality created the defe......
-
Weinstein v. Town of Hempstead, No. 9640/12.
...642 [2nd Dept.2011] ; De La Reguera v. City of New York, 74 A.D.3d 1127, 904 N.Y.S.2d 108 [2nd Dept.2010] ; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926, 875 N.Y.S.2d 259 [2nd Dept.2009] ; Smith v. Town of Brookhaven, 45 A.D.3d 567, 846 N.Y.S.2d 203 [2nd Dept.2007] ; see, Amabile v. City of B......
-
Reyhanian v. Vill. of Great Neck, Index No. 611516/2019
...of New York, 81 A.D.3d 788 [2d Dept 2011]; De La Reguera v. City of New York, 1A A.D.3d 1127 [2d Dept 2010]; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926 [2d Dept 2009]; Smith v. Town of Brookhaven, 45 A.D.3d 567 [2d Dept 2007]; see, Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 474 [1999]; Poir......
-
Dutka v. Odierno
...98 A.D.3d 1007, 951 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; De La Reguera v. City of Mount Vernon, 74 A.D.3d 1127, 904 N.Y.S.2d 108 ; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926, 875 N.Y.S.2d 259 ). "The only recognized exceptions to the statutory prior written notice requirement involve situations in which the muni......
-
Donadio v. City of N.Y., 2014-01725, 2014-08124
...98 A.D.3d 1007, 951 N.Y.S.2d 171 ; De La Reguera v. City of Mount Vernon, 74 A.D.3d 1127, 904 N.Y.S.2d 108 ; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926, 875 N.Y.S.2d 259 ). The Court of Appeals has recognized two exceptions to this rule: (1) 126 A.D.3d 853where the locality created the defe......
-
Weinstein v. Town of Hempstead, No. 9640/12.
...642 [2nd Dept.2011] ; De La Reguera v. City of New York, 74 A.D.3d 1127, 904 N.Y.S.2d 108 [2nd Dept.2010] ; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926, 875 N.Y.S.2d 259 [2nd Dept.2009] ; Smith v. Town of Brookhaven, 45 A.D.3d 567, 846 N.Y.S.2d 203 [2nd Dept.2007] ; see, Amabile v. City of B......
-
Reyhanian v. Vill. of Great Neck, Index No. 611516/2019
...of New York, 81 A.D.3d 788 [2d Dept 2011]; De La Reguera v. City of New York, 1A A.D.3d 1127 [2d Dept 2010]; Schleif v. City of New York, 60 A.D.3d 926 [2d Dept 2009]; Smith v. Town of Brookhaven, 45 A.D.3d 567 [2d Dept 2007]; see, Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 474 [1999]; Poir......