Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Min. Co.
Decision Date | 03 June 1895 |
Parties | SCHMIDT v. OREGON GOLD-MINING CO. [1] |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Union county; M.D. Clifford, Judge.
Suit to foreclose a mortgage by A.L. Schmidt, trustee, against the Oregon Gold-Mining Company. There was a decree for plaintiff from which he appeals. Dismissed.
This suit was instituted to foreclose three several mortgages executed by the Oregon Gold-Mining Company to A.L. Schmidt as trustee, to secure the payment of certain bonds of the company bearing dates, respectively, May 1 and October 1 1888, and September 1, 1889. Each of said mortgages, in effect, provides that in case of default of the conditions imposed the trustee might foreclose and sell the property described therein, and that out of the proceeds he should be allowed, for attorney's fees, such sum as the court might adjudge reasonable, together with all necessary costs and expenses incurred, including a reasonable compensation to himself for the execution of the trust. The complaint sets forth, by appropriate allegations, the legal purport of these promises; and the prayer, among other things, is "for judgment and decree fixing and determining the amount to which plaintiff is entitled in this suit for reasonable at torney's fees for foreclosing the said mortgage, and for professional services herein, and declaring the same a lien upon the said mortgaged property, rights, privileges, and franchises, and directing payment therefor out of the proceeds of said mines, and the proceeds arising from the sale of said mortgaged property." The decree, among other things, contains the following findings and provisions viz.: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Benavente v. Thayer
...court to do but to enter what the parties have agreed upon.’ " Magar , 288 Or. at 642, 607 P.2d 167 (quoting Schmidt v. Oregon G. Mining Co. , 28 Or. 9, 25, 40 P. 406, 408 (1895) ). That case also informs our construction of ORCP 54 E. See Black v. Arizala , 337 Or. 250, 261, 95 P.3d 1109 (......
-
Kleiner v. Randall
...agreed upon, and when so entered the parties themselves are concluded. From such a decree there is no appeal * * *." Schmidt v. Oregon Mining Co., 28 Or. 9, 25, 40 P. 406, 40 P. 1014, 52 AS 759 The stipulated settlement, agreed to in open court, is a contract and cannot be set aside except ......
-
Ramsey v. Johnson
... ... Co., 85 Tenn. 76; Reynolds v ... Stockton, 43 N.J. Eq. 211; Schmidt v. Min. Co., ... 28 Or. 9.) Where there are special findings, they must ... ...
-
Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.
...P. 1014 28 Or. 9 SCHMIDT v. OREGON GOLD-MINING CO. Supreme Court of OregonJuly 22, 1895 On rehearing. Denied. For former opinion, see 40 P. 406. WOLVERTON, A motion for rehearing having been filed in this case, and with it a vigorous and very able brief by Messrs. Dolph, Nixon & Dolph, of c......