Schneider v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.

Decision Date30 April 1882
Citation75 Mo. 295
PartiesSCHNEIDER v. THE MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court.--HON. WILLIAM T. WOOD, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Thos. J. Portis and E. A. Andrews for appellant.

HENRY, J.

This suit was to recover damages for the killing of a horse by defendant's locomotive engine and cars, and the petition alleges that: Defendant so carelessly and negligently ran and managed its locomotive engine and cars, on its railroad, as to run against and over said horse, thereby killing him.”Defendant objected to any evidence on the part of plaintiff, “because the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”This objection was overruled.That the petition is sufficient in such a case, has been repeatedly held by this court.Meyer v. Atlantic & Pacific R. R. Co.,64 Mo. 542;Goodwin v. R. R. Co.,75 Mo. 73.These cases are distinguishable from Waldhier v. R. R. Co.,71 Mo. 514.That was a suit by an employe against the company to recover damages for personal injuries, and the petition alleged specifically wherein defendant was negligent, and yet plaintiff was permitted to recover for negligence other than that specifically assigned.This was held by this court to be error.

The appellant also complains that the court permitted plaintiff to introduce evidence to show that the horse was killed at a public crossing, and that neither the whistle nor...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
115 cases
  • Mirrielees v. Wabash Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 12, 1901
    ...allegation," and one "which, as a matter of course, the defendant was not prepared to meet." Goodwin v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 73; Schneider v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 295; v. Railroad, 77 Mo. 232; Shaw v. Railroad, 104 Mo. 648; Sullivan v. Railroad, 97 Mo. 113; Robertson v. Railroad, 84 Mo. 119; Hill v......
  • Cushulas v. Schroeder & Tremayne
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 1930
    ... ... AND TREMAYNE, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR Court of Appeals of Missouri, St. LouisJanuary 7, 1930 ...           Error ... to the Circuit Court of the City of ... Springfield ... Traction Co., 180 Mo.App. 287, 298, 165 S.W. 346; Le ... May v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co., 105 Mo. 361, 16 S.W ... 1049; Conrad v. De Montcourt, 138 Mo. 311, 39 S.W ... 805; ... [Mack v. Railroad, 77 Mo. 232; Schneider v ... Railroad, 75 Mo. 295.] A general allegation of ... negligence is good unless it is ... ...
  • Guthrie v. City of St. Charles
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1941
    ... ... City of St. Charles, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant No. 36873 Supreme Court of Missouri June 10, 1941 ...           Appeal ... from Circuit Court of St. Charles County; Hon ... Chitty v. Railroad, 148 Mo. 64; ... Waldhier v. Railroad Co., 71 Mo. 514; Schneider ... v. Railroad Co., 75 Mo. 295; McNamee v. Railroad ... Co., 135 Mo. 440. (c) It was error to ... Mfg ... Co., 41 S.W.2d 543, 328 Mo. 417; 45 C. J. 920; ... Miller v. Union Pacific Ry. Co., 290 U.S. 227; ... Memphis Consol. Gas & Electric Co. v. Creighton, 183 ... F. 552 ... ...
  • Hilz v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1890
    ...v. Railroad, 97 Mo. 113; Neier v. Railroad, 12 Mo.App. 35; Otto v. Railroad, 12 Mo.App. 168; Mack v. Railroad, 77 Mo. 232; Schneider v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 295; Ellet v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 518; Coudy v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 79. (3) The point of appellant, that negligence at common law and negligence......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT