Schneider v. Solowey

Decision Date27 June 1988
Citation529 N.Y.S.2d 1017,141 A.D.2d 813
PartiesAllison M. SCHNEIDER, et al., Respondents, v. Carl SOLOWEY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Rossano, Mose, Connick and Hirchhorn, P.C., Garden City (A.G. Marangione and Frederick P. Mose, of counsel), for appellant. Abbott & Bushlow, Ridgewood (Richard Schechner, of counsel), for respondents.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), entered September 25, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for reargument of the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment which was granted in an order of the same court, dated April 27, 1987, and, upon reargument, vacated that order and denied the defendant's motion. ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The granting of a motion for reargument is within the sound discretion of the court which decided the prior motion, provided the movant shows that the court overlooked or misapprehended the facts or the law or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 cases
  • Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Cigna
    • United States
    • New York Civil Court
    • February 2, 2021
    ...1206(A), 977 N.Y.S.2d 668 ; Bolos v Staten Island Hosp. , 217 A.D.2d 643, 629 NYS 2d 809 [2d Dept 1995] ; Schneider v Solowey , 141 A.D.2d 813, 529 NYS 2d 1017 [2d Dept 1988] ). It has been held that proper practice requires that motion for relief to reargue must be brought by order to show......
  • Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 8, 1998
    ...its earlier decision.' " William P. Pahl Equipment Corp., supra, 182 A.D.2d, at 27, 588 N.Y.S.2d 8, quoting Schneider v. Solowey, 141 A.D.2d 813, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1017 (2d Dep't 1988). Reargument does not provide a party with an opportunity to advance new arguments. Rubenstein v. Goldman, 225 A......
  • William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. Kassis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 13, 1992
    ...overlooked or misapprehended the facts or the law or for some reason mistakenly arrived at its earlier decision." (Schneider v. Solowey, 141 A.D.2d 813, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1017.) Reargument is not designed to afford the unsuccessful party successive opportunities to reargue issues previously deci......
  • The Estate of Marilyn Monroe LLC v. Maleh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 6, 2023
    ... ... demonstrate that the court overlooked or misapprehended the ... relevant facts or misapplied controlling principles of law ... (see, Schneider v. Solowey, 141 ... A.D.2d 813 [2d Dept 1988]; Rodney v ... New York Pyrotechnic Products, Inc., 112 A.D.2d 410 ... [2d Dept 1985]). A "motion to ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT