Schock v. Board of Review, Div. of Employment Security, Dept. of Labor and Industry
| Decision Date | 07 November 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. A--22,A--22 |
| Citation | 223 A.2d 633,48 N.J. 121 |
| Parties | Robert C. SCHOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, State of New Jersey, and Public Service Electric & Gas Company, Defendants-Respondents. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
George Duggan, Newark, for plaintiff-appellant.
Edward A. Kaplan, Jersey City, for defendant-respondent Board of Review, Div. of Employment Security, Dept. of Labor and Industry (Edward A. Kaplan, of counsel).
Luke A. Kiernan, Jr., Newark, for defendant-respondent Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
The opinion of the court was delivered
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny for the majority of the Appellate Division. 89 N.J.Super. 118, 214 A.2d 40 (App.Div.1965). See also: Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation, Minn., 144 N.W.2d 377 (1966).
The Chief Justice and Justices Jacobs and Proctor dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in the dissent of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance: Justices FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--4.
For reversal: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS and PROCTOR--3.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brady v. Board of Review
... ... Retired workers could seek employment elsewhere at any wage rate without any effect on ... So do not contact labor relations until at least January 18th, for ... 54, 632 A.2d 852 (App.Div.1993), where the Appellate Division reasoned that ... The achievement of social security requires protection against this greatest hazard ... 447, 455, 100 A.2d 277 (1953); Schock v. Board of ... Page 212 ... Review, 89 ... ...
-
Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, Dept. of Labor
... ... It held that Sparks' loss of employment stemming from the suspension of his driving privileges does ... 447, 455, 100 A.2d 277 (1953); Schock v. Board of Review, Employment Sec., 89 N.J.Super. 118, , 214 A.2d 40 (App.Div. 1965), aff'd, 48 N.J. 121, 223 A.2d 633 (1966). In order ... Echols v. Michigan Security Commission, 380 Mich. 87, 155 N.W.2d 824 (1968), in ... ...
-
Gerber v. Board of Review
... ... obtained before leaving the subject employment. We hold in the circumstances presented, if it ... 53, 59, 146 A.2d 488 (App.Div.1958). Moreover, claimant had discussed her ... (citing Schock v. Board of Review, 89 N.J.Super. 118, 125, 214 ... ...
- Shaw v. Kirschbaum