SCHOENWETTER v. State Of Fla.
Decision Date | 01 July 2010 |
Docket Number | No. SC09-955,No. SC08-2271,SC08-2271,SC09-955 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | RANDY LAMAR SCHOENWETTER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. RANDY SCHOENWETTER, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. MCNEIL, etc., Respondent. |
Bill Jennings, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, and James L. Driscoll, Jr., Assistant CCR Counsel, Middle Region, Tampa, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
Randy Schoenwetter appeals a circuit court order denying his motion to vacate his convictions of first-degree murder and sentences of death, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. He also petitions this Court for a writ
of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. Having considered the issues raised in the briefs and having heard oral argument, we now affirm the circuit court's order and deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Appellant's case was previously heard by this Court on direct appeal from his conviction and sentencing in the circuit court. See Schoenwetter v. State, 931 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 2006). In our opinion affirming appellant's conviction and death sentences, we described the facts of the underlying offenses as follows:
Id. at 862-63. Regarding the injuries suffered by the victims, we stated:
The morning after the incident, law enforcement officers encountered the appellant after following a trail of blood which led from the Friskey residence to the apartment complex where Schoenwetter lived with his mother. Schoenwetter agreed to accompany two detectives to the police station for an interview, whichwas videotaped. Although he initially denied any involvement, Schoenwetter subsequently confessed to the crimes and gave a detailed statement to the officers. See id. at 863-64. This statement was corroborated by blood DNA testing based on samples taken from Schoenwetter's clothes, Virginia Friskey's bedroom, and other items and locations. The blood trail leading from the Friskey residence was determined to match Schoenwetter's blood DNA, which was also found on the handle of the knife used against the victims. See id. at 864.
Schoenwetter was indicted on August 29, 2000, for first-degree murder in the death of Virginia Friskey, first-degree murder in the death of Ronald Friskey, attempted first-degree murder of Haesun Friskey, and armed burglary of a dwelling. See id. at 861. On February 17, 2003, Schoenwetter wrote a letter to the trial judge confessing his guilt and indicating that he wished to change his plea from not guilty to guilty. He also stated that his reason for entering the residence was to force one or both of the Friskey daughters to have sex with him. A status hearing was held on February 26, 2003. Against the advice of counsel to remain silent, and after a cautionary instruction by the trial judge, Schoenwetter admitted to the court that he had written the letter and expressed his desire to change his plea to guilty. A guilty plea to all charges was entered on March 5, 2003.
Penalty phase proceedings were held from September 15 through September 25, 2003. At the end of the proceedings, the jury recommended death for themurder of Virginia Friskey by a vote of ten to two, and for the murder of Ronald Friskey by a vote of nine to three. The court held a Spencer1 hearing on November 7, 2003, and subsequently imposed a sentence of death for each first-degree murder charge and sentences of life in prison for the attempted murder and armed burglary charges. The court found three aggravating circumstances to be applicable to both murders: (1) the defendant had been convicted of another capital offense or of a felony involving the use or threat of violence to some person; (2) the crime for which the defendant was to be sentenced was committed while he was engaged in the commission of or the attempt to commit the crime of burglary; and (3) the crime was committed for the purpose of avoiding or preventing a lawful arrest. As to the murder of Virginia Friskey, the court also found the aggravating circumstance that the victim was a person of less than twelve years of age. As to the murder of Ronald Friskey, the court found that the crime was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel (HAC).
The trial court considered and assigned weight to the following statutory mitigating circumstances: (1) lack of prior criminal history (little weight); (2) extreme mental or emotional disturbance (little weight);2 (3) lack of capacity toconform conduct to the requirements of the law (little weight);3 and (4) the defendant's age (eighteen) at the time of the crime (little weight). The court also considered and weighed eight of the nine nonstatutory mitigators proposed by...
To continue reading
Request your trial