Schonfeld v. Engler
Citation | 160 So. 879,119 Fla. 138 |
Parties | SCHONFELD et al. v. ENGLER. |
Decision Date | 25 April 1935 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Florida |
Suit by Minnie Engler against Joe Schonfeld, also known as Joseph Schonfeld, and Jacob Engler. From a decree for complainant defendants appeal.
Reversed in part, with directions, and affirmed in part. Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County, H. F. Atkinson judge.
J. N Morris and Louis Heiman, both of Miami, for appellants.
Albert S. Dubbin and Nat L. Williams, both of Miami, for appellee.
The appellee filed a bill of complaint against the appellant Jacob Engler, to coerce the payment of separate maintenance, suit money, and solicitors' fees. That bill was filed on May 13, 1932. On November 21, 1932, she filed an amended bill of complaint in which she made Joe Schonfeld, also known as Joseph Schonfeld, party defendant.
In the amended bill of complaint, besides the relief prayed in the original bill of complaint, she sought to set aside and cancel certain conveyances of real estate made and executed by a corporation, the Miami & Miami Beach Sea Salt Company, a Florida corporation, to Joe Schonfeld and to set aside and cancel certain other conveyances of real estate made to Joe Schonfeld upon the ground that such conveyances were fraudulently made and without consideration. She prayed for the appointment of a receiver to immediately take charge of the property described and that the receiver be ordered to collect all rents, issues, and proceeds from said property and that the income from said property be turned into the registry of the court to await further order of the court.
On final hearing, amongst other things, it was decreed:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marcus v. Hull
...the lower court's findings of fact are entitled to the same weight and consideration on appeal as the verdict of a jury. Schonfeld v. Engler, 119 Fla. 138, 160 So. 879; Boyte v. Stoer, 114 Fla. 395, 153 So. Fickling Properties v. Smith, 123 Fla. 556, 167 So. 42; Dolan Properties v. Vonnegut......
-
Miller v. Bay-to-gulf, Inc.
... ... supported by the evidence unless it is made clearly to appear ... that such finding is erroneous. Schonfeld v. Engler, ... 119 Fla. 138, 160 So. 879; Boyte v. Stoer, 114 Fla ... 395, 153 So. 845; Fickling Properties, Inc. [141 ... Fla. 458] v. Smith, ... ...
-
Francis v. Francis
... ... v. Liddon, 62 Fla. 428, 56 So. 410; People's ... Realty Co. v. Southern Colonization Co., 78 Fla. 628, 83 ... So. 527. See, also, Schonfeld v. Engler, 119 Fla ... 138, 160 So. 879; Hill v. Padgett, 114 Fla. 519, 153 ... So. 911; Hilton v. Northern Cent. Trust Co., 114 ... Fla. 796, ... ...
-
Palm Beach Sash & Door Co. v. Rice
... ... 396, 159 So. 868. It is settled law ... that a decree will not be reversed on facts unless clearly ... erroneous. See Schonfeld v. Engler, 119 Fla. 138, ... 160 So. 879. The Supreme Court will not disturb a ... Chancellor's findings on facts unless shown to be clearly ... ...