Schrock v. Hylton, 12868.
Decision Date | 14 October 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 12868.,12868. |
Citation | 133 S.W.2d 175 |
Parties | SCHROCK et al. v. HYLTON et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Paine L. Bush, Judge.
Election contest by T. M. Schrock and others against B. F. Hylton and others. From an adverse judgment, the contestants appeal.
Judgment reformed, and as reformed, affirmed.
Geo. Clifton Edwards, of Dallas, for appellants.
Taylor, Irwin & Irwin, Dean Gauldin, and Wallace B. Moore, all of Dallas, for appellees.
This suit is an election contest. T. M. Schrock, A. M. Irwin, W. W. Evers, and A. J. Smith contested the election of B. F. Hylton, R. E. Curtis, Ben Prevatil, and R. E. Prine, as supervisors, and H. C. McDonald contested the election of C. J. Traquair, as assessor and collector of taxes, in and for Dallas County Lakeland Terrace Fresh Water Supply District No. 12. The contestants were incumbents, seeking re-election at an election held January 3, 1939, for five supervisors and an assessor and collector of taxes for the district. The results declared were as follows: In favor of L. C. Brooks, as supervisor, the validity of whose election is not involved; also, in favor of contestees, Hylton, Prine, Prevatil and Curtis, as supervisors, and Traquair, as assessor and collector of taxes.
In the trial court, contestants were defeated and appealed to this Court. On original submission, we held the election void, because the same was conducted without a certified poll list of the qualified voters of the Water District, as required by general statute (Art. 2975), therefore, set aside the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for contestants, nullifying and holding the election for naught.
Our decision was largely based upon the case of Yett v. Cook, 115 Tex. 205, 281 S.W. 837, by the Supreme Court, on the assumption that the general statutes brought under construction in the Yett-Cook case, were applicable and controlled the election held in the Water District, but, after reconsidering the question, we have reached the conclusion that, we erred in holding the election void and in nullifying same, for the reasons stated.
An opinion by Mr. BOND, Chief Justice, presented to our conference, and concurred in by other members, sets forth our unanimous opinion on the decisive questions involved. His opinion reads:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rouw v. Harrington
...32 S.W.2d 871; Border v. Abell, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1186; Marks v. Jackson, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 925; Shrock v. Hylton, Tex.Civ.App., 133 S.W.2d 175; Roberts v. Hall, Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W.2d This rule is somewhat broadened and extended by Dickson v. Strickland, 114 Tex. 176, 285 S......
-
Wright v. Graves
...no writ); Christy v. Oliphint, 291 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Civ.App.--Galveston 1956), affirmed, 157 Tex. 1, 299 S.W.2d 933 (1957); Schrock v. Hylton, 133 S.W.2d 175 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1939, no writ); State v. Fletcher, 50 S.W.2d 450 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1932, writ dism'd).4 Appellant urges th......
-
Davis v. Blakeley, 2801.
...ex rel. Paggi v. Fletcher, Tex.Civ. App., 50 S.W.2d 450 (er. den.); Border v. Abell, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1186; Schrock v. Hylton, Tex.Civ.App., 133 S.W. 2d 175. On the other hand, appellee says the requirements that poll tax lists be furnished to the election judges and that the offici......
-
Snelson v. Murray
...not relate to elections generally, and therefore the suffrage provision of the Constitution has no application to it. Schrock v. Hylton, Tex.Civ.App., 133 S.W.2d 175, 176, loc. cit. 177(2-4) citing Wallis v. Williams, 101 Tex. 395, 108 S.W. As pointed out, under the original Act the Assesso......