Schruben v. Johnson

Decision Date13 July 1927
Citation94 Fla. 204,113 So. 640
PartiesWm. H. SCHRUBEN et al., etc., Appellants v. Olive H. JOHNSON, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

In Banc.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Glades County; George W. Whitehurst, Judge.

COUNSEL

O. S. Miller, of West Palm Beach, for appellants.

R. C. Horne, of Madison, for appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said order of the circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

BUFORD, J., disqualified.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Cook v. Pontious
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 1 Agosto 1929
    ...tax title against the former record title, this case would necessarily be affirmed because of our per curiam holding in the case of Schruben v. Johnson, supra. In case of Stuart v. Stephanus, 94 Fla. 1087, 114 So. 767, decided December 10, 1927, we said: 'In the present state of our law, a ......
  • Holgate v. Jones
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 13 Julio 1927

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT