Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc.

Decision Date06 April 1971
Docket NumberNo. 70--708,70--708
CitationSchubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc., 247 So.2d 484 (Fla. App. 1971)
PartiesMichael SCHUBOWSKY, Appellant, v. HEARN FOOD STORE, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, and Quitman Eugene Hearn, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Ralph P. Ezzo, Miami, and Richard H. W. Maloy, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Jeanne Heyward and Robert H. Crary, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

CHARLES CARROLL, Judge.

Appellant, a customer in a grocery store owned by the appellees, was injured by a robber's gunshot in a gunfire affray between the store proprietor and two armed robbers, when the proprietor resisted the robbers by attempting to get the 'drop' on the robbers and to arrest them.The appellant sued the appellees for damages for personal injuries alleging resistance of the robbers by the proprietor which plaintiff charged was negligent, and alleging the owners were negligent in failing to have an alarm system and for entrusting a firearm to the employee for protection purposes.The trial court directed a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.We hold the ruling of the trial court was correct, and affirm the judgment.

The defendants' employee was privileged and justified in defending his own life and the employers' property when faced by the armed robbers.In resisting the robbers, the proprietor had justification over and above an ordinary elective act entailing risk to a third person.When an opportunity arose to get the 'drop' on the robbers, the proprietor was entitled to act upon it in resistance of the robbery.The fact that in the course of his resistance, which succeeded in averting the robbery, the customer who was present was shot by one of the robbers,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Kentucky Fried Chicken of Cal., Inc. v. Superior Court
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1997
    ...otherwise cause actionable damage." (Yingst v. Pratt (1966) 139 Ind.App. 695, 700, 220 N.E.2d 276, 279.) In Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc. (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1971) 247 So.2d 484: "The defendants' employee was privileged and justified in defending his own life and the employers' property......
  • Nigido v. First Nat. Bank of Baltimore
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • March 9, 1972
    ...robbery; Genovay v. Fox, 29 N.J. 436, 149 A.2d 212 (1959), bowling alley patron shot during an armed robbery; Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc., 247 So.2d 484 (Fla.App.1971), customer of a grocery store injured by armed robbers; and Brodie v. Miller, 24 Tenn.aPp. 316, 143 S.W.2d 1042 (19......
  • Bennett v. Baker's Estate
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • September 14, 1976
    ...stood still, the teller did not act negligently in attempting to save himself and his employer's property. In Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc., 247 So.2d 484 (Fla.App.1971), appellant, a customer in a grocery store, was injured by a robber's gunshot in a gunfire affray between the store......
  • Schultz v. Elm Beverage Shoppe
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1988
    ...or their agents against armed robbers. See, e.g., Yingst v. Pratt (1966), 139 Ind.App. 695, 220 N.E.2d 276; Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc. (Fla.App.1971), 247 So.2d 484. Nevertheless, the privilege is subject to a limitation where the otherwise tortious conduct is directed towards a t......
  • Get Started for Free