Schweer v. Schweer
Decision Date | 07 October 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 5577.,5577. |
Citation | 86 S.W.2d 969 |
Parties | SCHWEER v. SCHWEER. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Maries County; Nike G. Sevier, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Suit by Maggie Schweer against August Schweer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
John P. Peters, of Linn, and Irwin & Bushman, of Jefferson City, for appellant.
H. P. Lauf and John O. Bond, both of Jefferson City, and Leslie B. Hutchison, of Vienna, for respondent.
This proceeding was instituted by the appellant as plaintiff, by filing her petition in the circuit court of Maries county, Mo., on the 5th day of June, 1934, which petition, omitting caption and signatures, is as follows:
To which petition defendant, Hutchison, the administrator of the estate of F. W. Schweer, deceased, demurred as follows:
1st. "That the petition of the plaintiff in the above entitled cause does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against this defendant."
2d. "That the petition of the plaintiff in the above entitled cause states facts upon which the face of the petition shows that plaintiff does not have legal capacity to sue."
The demurrer was by the trial court sustained, from which order plaintiff appealed to this court.
The facts in this case are, we think, correctly stated by respondent, as follows:
That one F. W. Schweer died intestate in Maries county, Mo., on the 18th day of October, 1930. That he left as heirs to his estate his widow, the plaintiff, and the several children and grandchildren, named in the petition.
That the petition of appellant shows by agreement between all the parties, Leslie B. Hutchison of Vienna, Mo., a lawyer, was appointed by the probate court of Maries county as administrator of the estate of F. W. Schweer, deceased.
That the petition herein was filed by appellant in the circuit court of Maries county, Mo., and was returnable to the September term, 1934, of the circuit court of said county. That the filing of this case occurred more than three years after appellant had made her election, in probate court, under the provisions of section 329, R. S. Mo. 1929 (Mo. St. Ann. § 329, p. 216).
From the record in this case, it appears that no pleadings were filed in behalf of the defendant, with the exception of the administrator, Leslie B. Hutchison.
The petition also shows that F. W. Schweer, at the time of his death, was possessed of a large amount of real estate, and that the homestead, containing 156 acres more or less, was set off as a homestead to the widow, this appellant.
Appellant's petition further alleges that within one year, allowed under the law, a large number of claims were filed and allowed against the estate of F. W. Schweer, deceased, and that, in order to pay the debts of deceased, it would be necessary to sell the real estate.
The petition also shows upon its face that appellant was duly advised by the administrator, Mr. Hutchison, of her alternative right of election to take a child's part, subject to the payment of the debts of deceased, or, in lieu thereof, her dower right. The petition alleges no fraudulent statements to have been made by the administrator, nor does it charge either fraud or deceit against said administrator, nor does the petition allege that petitioner (appellant) made any investigation to ascertain the condition of said estate at the time she made her election, and that, when she made her said election, there were...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hartt's Estate, In re
...529, 87 P.2d 745, 120 A.L.R. 1266, designates the statute as a statute of limitation. Other cases to the same effect are Schweer v. Schweer, Mo.App., 86 S.W.2d 969; Ludington v. Patton, 111 Wis. 208, 86 N.W. 571; In re Zweig's Estate, 145 Misc. 839, 261 N.Y.S. 400; Akin v. Kellogg, 119 N.Y.......
-
Sutorius v. Mayor
... ... 46 S.W.2d 135; Arrington v. McCluer, 34 S.W.2d 67; ... In re Bernays' Estate, 126 S.W.2d 209; Secs ... 332, 333, R. S. 1939; Schweer v. Schweer, 86 S.W.2d ... 969; O'Brien v. Sedalia Trust Co., 5 S.W.2d 74; ... Register v. Henley, 70 Mo. 189; Dougherty v ... Barnes, 64 ... ...
-
Bostian v. Milens
... ... 835. (5) The claim of a binding acceptance by Bessie ... Eichenberg. Seifner v. Weller (Mo.), 171 S.W.2d 617, l ... c. 623; Schweer v. Schweer (Mo. App.), 86 S.W.2d ... 969, l. c. 973; In re Flynn's Estate (Mo. App.), ... 67 S.W.2d 771, l. c. 775; Hanssen v. Karbe (Mo ... ...
-
Sutorius v. Mayor
...Summit Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cross, 345 Mo. 501, 134 S.W.2d 19; O'Brien v. Sedalia Trust Co., 319 Mo. 1001, 5 S.W.2d 74; Schweer v. Schweer, Mo.App., 86 S.W.2d 969. We think the period of limitations fixed by the statute, supra, has no application under the facts of this It may be conced......