Scolavino v. State

Decision Date22 May 1947
Citation74 N.E.2d 174,297 N.Y. 460
PartiesMichael SCOLAVINO, Respondent, v. STATE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, 271 App.Div. 618, 67 N.Y.S.2d 202.

Proceeding by Michael Scolavino, an infant, by Anthony Scolavino, his guardian, against the State of New York, for personal injuries sustained at the hands of an inmate of state hospital while such infant was also confined therein. While claimant was strapped to his bed by a restraining sheet, he was frightfully assaulted by another inmate of the Harlem Valley State Hospital, Benturira, who broke from his restraining sheet and in the assault, besides other injuries, enucleated both of claimant's eyes.

On the date of the assault there were 66 patients in the disturbed ward, which consisted of eight dormitories and twenty single rooms. Five patients were confined to the dormitory known as the restraint room, in restraint sheets, and only two attendants were on duty in such ward, only one of whom was assigned to the half of the ward which included the restraint room. No effort was made to keep the patients in the restraint room under constant observation. It was the practice of the attendants to make rounds at about half hour intervals but these varied considerably and there were apparently no written regulations governing the matter. At the time of the assault the nearest attendant was some 60 feet away, in the dayroom, where he could not possibly watch conditions in the restraint room. Apparently somewhat more than 30 minutes had elapsed since the last inspection. No attendant knew of the assault until it was fully completed.

From a judgment for plaintiff for $9,000, 187 Misc. 253, 62 N.Y.S.2d 17, the State appealed, and the claimant cross-appealed after his motion for leave to appeal as a poor person was granted by the Appellate Division, 270 App.Div. 1055, 62 N.Y.S.2d 869. The judgment was modified by the Appellate Division, 271 App.Div. 618, 67 N.Y.S.2d 202, by increasing the award to $20,000. From the judgment of the Appellate Division, the State of New York appeals.

Affirmed.Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Atty. Gen. (Wendell P. Brown, Sol. Gen., of Albany, and John R. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for appellant.

Weissberger & Leichter, of New York City (M. M. Leichter and Julius Wolfson, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • Judge Rotenberg Educ. Ctr. Inc. v. Blass
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 25, 2012
    ...confined to State institutions.” Schrempf v. State, 66 N.Y.2d 289, 496 N.Y.S.2d 973, 487 N.E.2d 883 (1985); see Scolavino v. State of New York, 297 N.Y. 460, 74 N.E.2d 174 (1947). This duty has been recognized, not only in cases where the State has been negligent in permitting a mental pati......
  • Schrempf v. State
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • November 19, 1985
    ...Hirsch v. State of New York, 8 N.Y.2d 125, 202 N.Y.S.2d 296, 168 N.E.2d 372 [suicide by patient in hospital]; Scolavino v. State of New York, 297 N.Y. 460, 74 N.E.2d 174 [assault on another patient]; Bell v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 90 A.D.2d 270, 456 N.Y.S.2d 787 [patient suici......
  • Rodriguez v. State
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • April 18, 1974
    ...v. State of New York, 201 Misc. 3, 109 N.Y.S.2d 862 (Ct.Cls., 1952). As to cases involving fellow patients, see Scolavino v. State of New York, 297 N.Y. 460, 74 N.E.2d 174 (1947); Dowly v. State of New York, 190 Misc. 16, 68 N.Y.S.2d 573 (Ct.Cls., 1947); Zajaczkowski v. State of New York, 1......
  • Tinnerholm v. Parke Davis & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • May 15, 1968
    ...v. State, 187 Misc. 253, 263, 62 N.Y.S.2d 17 (Ct.Cl.), modified, 271 App.Div. 618, 67 N.Y.S.2d 202 (3rd Dep't 1946), aff'd, 297 N.Y. 460, 74 N.E.2d 174 (1947), and is clearly inapposite since the condition of the infant in that case prior to the accident made his future employment impossibl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT