Scott v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 08 October 1956 |
| Parties | Franklin SCOTT, Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Andrew Bellanca, New York City, for appellant.
Morris Eisenstein, Brooklyn, for respondent. Before NOLAN, P. J., and WENZEL, MURPHY, UGHETTA, and HALLINAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Pursuant to leave granted by the Appellate Term, the appeal is from the order of the Appellate Term which reversed a judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, entered after trial, dismissing the complaint at the end of the plaintiff's case, and directed a new trial with costs to plaintiff to abide the event.
Order reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.
The is an action for damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of appellant's alleged negligence. From the proof adduced, it appears that appellant's police officers were engaged in pursuit of a fleeing prisoner in the course of which there was an exchange of pistol shots, one of which lodged in the person of respondent, a pedestrian citizen, not otherwise involved in the chase, who was coming up a subway exit stairway. The prisoner previously had been apprehended as a suspect on a robbery charge, and was being interrogated by a detective in a squad room when he lunged at the arresting officer, seized the latter's service revolver, fired a shot at him, and ran out of the police station into the street. A number of police officers chased after him, firing their guns at him. Upon the recapture of the prisoner, it was found that all six bullets in the arresting officer's revolver had been fired.
No proof was adduced that the escaping prisoner had any history, criminal or otherwise, known to appellant, which would indicate that he was a person of violent or dangerous propensities requiring handcuffing or restraint. No proof was adduced that this prisoner was in fact connected with the robbery charge on which he was apprehended, or that the robbery was in fact itself a crime of violence. Apparently the prisoner had remained docile while in custody, until he struck out at the arresting officer and purloined his gun. The proof also fails to show whether respondent was struck by a bullet fired by the escaping prisoner or by any of the pursuing officers.
Under the circumstances established by the proof, appellant, as jailer, owned no duty to the respondent, as private citizen, for damages incurred...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green v. Denison
...cases in our reports applying the official immunity and public duty doctrines. Our conclusion is consistent with Scott v. City of New York, 2 A.D.2d 854, 155 N.Y.S.2d 787 (1956), affirmed 9 N.Y.2d 764, 215 N.Y.S.2d 72, 174 N.E.2d 745 (1961), which holds that a police officer owes no duty to......
-
Massengill v. Yuma County
...2 Cal.Rptr. 700; Libertella v. Maenza, 21 Misc.2d 317, 191 N.Y.S.2d 191, aff'd., 16 A.D.2d 831, 229 N.Y.S.2d 229; Scott v. City of New York, 2 A.D.2d 854, 155 N.Y.S.2d 787, aff'd., 9 N.Y.2d 764, 215 N.Y.S.2d 72, 174 N.E.2d 745; Leger v. Kelley, 19 Conn.Sup. 167, 110 A.2d 635, aff'd., 142 Co......
-
Johnson v. State
...no history and had been so docile in custody that there appeared to be no need for handcuffs or other restraints (Scott v. City of New York, 2 A.D.2d 854, 155 N.Y.S.2d 787, affd. 9 N.Y.2d 764, 215 N.Y.S.2d 72, 174 N.E.2d When it is the prisoner or inmate, rather than a third party, who is i......
-
Citrola v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
...to the two children. Judgment affirmed as modified. * Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 291(a). 1 Scott v. City of New York, 1956, 2 A.D. 2d 854, 155 N.Y.S.2d 787, appeal allowed 1957, 3 N.Y.2d 930, 167 N.Y.S.2d 949, 145 N.E.2d 888, and Finn v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 1958, 6 A.......