Scott v. Hossley
| Decision Date | 12 April 1926 |
| Docket Number | 25633 |
| Citation | 142 Miss. 611,107 So. 760 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | SCOTT, SHERIFF, ETC., v. HOSSLEY. [*] |
1. LICENSES. In view of legislative history, suit to collect privilege tax on slot machines for year 1924 cannot be maintained (Code 1906, section 3786 [Hemingway's Code section 6486]; Laws 1914, chapter 110; Laws 1920, chapter 104, sections 7, 64; Laws 1922, chapter 239, sections 1-3; Laws 1924, chapters, 120, 339).
In view of legislative history (Code 1906, section 3786 [Hemingway's Code, section 6486], Laws 1914, chapter 110, Laws 1920, chapter 104, sections 7, 64, Laws 1922, chapter 239, sections 1-3, Laws 1924, chapters 120, 339), suit to recover privilege tax on slot machines for the year 1924 cannot be maintained, since Code 1906, section 3786 originally imposing privilege tax on gaming devices, and which although amended had retained its identity, was expressly repealed by Laws 1922, chapter 239, though Laws 1924, chapter 120, amended the law so as to increase privilege tax on such machines.
2 STATUTES. Intention of legislature to impose tax on business made unlawful by another statute will not be imputed, unless language clearly requires such construction.
Though legislature has power to impose a tax on business made un lawful by another statute, the intention so to do will not be imputed to it unless language of the statute clearly requires such construction.
APPEAL from circuit court of Warren county, HON. E. L. BRIEN, Judge.
Suit by F. A. Scott, sheriff and tax collector of Warren county, against H. H. Hossley. From a judgment sustaining the demurrer to the declaration and dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
A. A. Chaney, for appellant.
The appellant, the tax collector, filed suit in the circuit court against Harry H. Hossley, the appellee, for five hundred dollars, that being the amount due, together with damages, for operating a slot machine without first obtaining a privilege license as required by law.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to the declaration. The trial court was manifestly in error. Under the provisions of section 6634, Hemingway's Code, the sheriff may proceed by suit, in collecting the taxes, or by distraining the property.
The next question is: What is the privilege license on slot machines? See section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920. This section, fixing the license at two hundred and fifty dollars, has never been repealed. However, section 64, of the same chapter, was amended by chapter 120, Laws of 1924, the amendment having reference only to automatic weighing machines, gum slot machines, stamp machines, coin slot machines, and vending machines. No reference was made to section 7, Laws of 1920, however, which provided that the two hundred and fifty dollars "shall be in addition to any and all other privilege license." Therefore, the privilege license, as fixed by section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920, is still in force and effect.
The next question that may be argued is whether or not the legislature has the power to fix a privilege license on an illegal business. See Tax Collector v. Rombach, 112 Miss. 737, which settles this question in the affirmative.
Brunini & Hirsch, for appellee.
Boiled down, the demurrer, which was sustained, sets up "no cause of action." Appellant undertakes to maintain his action on section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920, which, however, was expressly repealed by section 1, chapter 239, Laws of 1922.
For the history of the legislation on the subject, see in order: Section 3786, Code of 1906; chapter 110, Laws of 1914. Note the language of the latter. No distinction is made between the slot machine "proper" and the slot "vending" machine. That was not in the mind of the legislature at the time of the imposition of a license on the "slot machine," as distinguished from the "slot vending machine." See section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920. Note that here we have the full recognition of the slot machine in the general sense. Now see section 64, chapter 104, Laws of 1920, section 1, chapter 110, Laws of 1914, on vending machines, including "slot vending machines." With the last two acts, appellee now offers chapter 239, page 324, Laws of 1922, an act repealing section 3786, Code of 1906 (section 6486, Hemingway's Supplement) so as to prohibit the operation of cane racks, knife racks, artful dodgers, punch boards, roll downs, merchandise wheels, slot machines, and prescribing penalties.
Appellant contends that section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920, has never been repealed. It is true that chapter 239, Laws of 1922, does not specifically mention section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920; but, as section 7, amends section 3786, Code of 1906, then section 1, chapter 239, Laws of 1924, must be taken and accepted as reading "that section 3786 of the Mississippi Code of 1906, section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920, be and the same is hereby repealed," because section 3786, Code of 1906, section 7, chapter 104, Laws of 1920, was section 3786, at the time of the enactment of chapter 239, Laws of 1922.
Furthermore, chapter 120, Laws of 1924, (section 3786, Code of 1906), was repealed, as we have seen, by section 1, chapter 239, Laws of 1922, but it was passed to show that section 2, chapter 239, Laws of 1922, should not be construed as making it unlawful to operate the automatic vending machines.
We submit that there is no merit in appellant's brief.
Argued orally by Jno. B. Brunini, and R. C. Canizaro, for appellee.
The appellant, the sheriff and tax collector of Warren county, instituted suit in the circuit court against the appellee to recover a privilege tax of two hundred fifty dollars on a slot machine, for the year beginning June, 1924, and also one hundred per cent damages, making a total demand of five hundred dollars. The appellee demurred to the declaration on the ground, among others, that it stated no cause of action, and the appellant has appealed from an order sustaining this demurrer and dismissing the suit.
There are several acts of the legislature which shed light upon the question here involved.
Section 3786 of the Code of 1906 imposed a privilege tax of fifty dollars for each county, "on each cane rack, knife rack, artful dodger, ring board, or similar contrivance, by whatever name called, kept or operated for public or private use." It will be noted that this section does not impose a tax upon "slot machines" or "slot vending machines," but chapter 110, Laws of 1914, imposed a small privilege tax on automatic weighing machines and gum slot machines, automatic musical instruments, stamp machines, and all other vending machines.
The legislature of 1920, by section 7 of chapter 104, Laws of 1920, amended section 3786, Code of 1906, section 6486, Hemingway's Code, as follows:
By section 64 of the said chapter 104, Laws of 1924, chapter 110, Laws of 1914, which imposed a small privilege tax on vending machines, was amended so as to...
To continue reading
Request your trial