Scott v. Meek, 17053
Decision Date | 10 August 1955 |
Docket Number | No. 17053,17053 |
Citation | 88 S.E.2d 768,228 S.C. 29 |
Parties | J. H. SCOTT, Appellant, v. C. P. MEEK, Respondent. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Williams & Busbee, Aiken, for appellant.
Henderson, Salley & Cushman, Aiken, for respondent.
Answering the complaint in this action for damages arising out of an automobile collision, the defendant, after pleading a general denial and contributory negligence and recklessness, set up a counterclaim for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have been sustained by him as the result of the said collision. Plaintiff moved to strike the counterclaim as sham and frivolous, basing his motion upon the pleadings and an affidavit of Lowry H. Dorris, an adjuster for Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, insurer of plaintiff against liability for death, personal injury or property damage resulting to another from the operation of his automobile. Mr. Dorris' affidavit, after reciting his employment as aforesaid and the report of the accident in question by the insured, proceeds: . Continuing, the affidavit avers that a copy of the release is attached as part and parcel of it, and that the original is in the hands of plaintiff's counsel for exhibition to the court upon the hearing of the motion.
The release reads as follows:
'In...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Scott v. Meek
...which motion was refused. Upon appeal to this Court, the Order was reversed and the counterclaim ordered stricken. Scott v. Meek, 228 S.C. 29, 88 S.E.2d 768. The cause thereafter came on for hearing upon its merits before the Honorable William H. Grimball, Presiding Judge, on November 16, 1......
-
Keith v. Glenn, 673
...is in fact full compensation for the injuries defendant says he sustained. Therein is the difference between this case and Scott v. Meek, 228 S.C. 29, 88 S.E.2d 768, relied on by plaintiff in support of his motion to When the court overruled the motion to strike, plaintiff was called upon t......
-
Bell v. Forrest Paschal Machinery Co. and Engineering Associates, Inc., 21559
...trial court had no choice but to strike it as a sham. Town of Bennettsville v. Bledsoe, 226 S.C. 214, 217, 84 S.E.2d 554; Scott v. Meek, 228 S.C. 29, 33, 88 S.E.2d 768. The appellant's first defense set up a restraining order issued by the U. S. District Court for North Carolina acting as a......
-
Blackwell v. United Ins. Co. of America
...form, but false in fact and not pleaded in good faith, being a mere pretense. Baker v. Allen, 220 S.C. 141, 66 S.E.2d 618; Scott v. Meek, 228 S.C. 29, 88 S.E.2d 768. The remedy is rarely allowed. Tow of Bennettsville v. Bledsoe, 226 S.C. 214, 84 S.E.2d In the absence of the contract documen......