Scott v. State, 1 Div. 602

Decision Date09 October 1969
Docket Number1 Div. 602
Citation284 Ala. 733,227 So.2d 438
PartiesDonald SCOTT v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Thos. M. Haas, Mobile, for petitioner.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Richard F. Calhoun, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

SIMPSON, Justice.

Petition of Donald Scott for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Scott v. State, 45 Ala.App. 149, 227 So.2d 436 (1 Div. 3).

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C.J., and COLEMAN, BLOODWORTH and MADDOX, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Young v. City of Hokes Bluff
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 27, 1992
    ...Beals v. State, 533 So.2d 717, 722 (Ala.Cr.App.1988); Scott v. State, 45 Ala.App. 149, 227 So.2d 436, cert. denied, 284 Ala. 733, 227 So.2d 438 (1969). Accordingly, we find that a valid U.T.T.C., sworn to before a judge or magistrate, is sufficient to fulfill the "cause of complaint" requir......
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 15, 1977
    ...in the light most favorable to the verdict as we are required. Scott v. State, 45 Ala.App. 149, 227 So.2d 436, cert. denied, 284 Ala. 733, 227 So.2d 438 (1969); Bass v. State, 55 Ala.App. 88, 313 So.2d 208 (1975). The facts in this case are sufficient to sustain a conviction for sodomy. In ......
  • Lomax v. State of Ala.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 27, 1980
    ...v. State, 215 Ala. 318, 111 So. 204 (1926); Scott v. State, 45 Ala.App. 149, 227 So.2d 436 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 284 Ala. 733, 227 So.2d 438 (Ala.1969). The statute is not controlling for sixth amendment purposes.7 At oral argument counsel for the State of Alabama stated that it wa......
  • Beals v. State, 7 Div. 955
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 14, 1988
    ...of the prosecution before the [district court]." Scott v. State, 45 Ala.App. 149, 151, 227 So.2d 436, 437, cert. denied, 284 Ala. 733, 227 So.2d 438 (1969). Section 12-22-113 provides that "[t]he trial in the circuit court shall be de novo" and specifies the proper form for the complaint. P......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT