Scott v. US
Decision Date | 19 November 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 92-00011.,92-00011. |
Citation | 847 F. Supp. 1499 |
Parties | Nicholas T. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii |
Nicholas T. Scott, pro se.
Daniel Bent, Michael Chun, Asst., U.S. Attys. Office, Honolulu, HI, Thomas Moore, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for USA and IRS, Director.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
THIS MATTER came before the Court for trial on October 5, 1993 through October 7, 1993. Having considered the testimony and other evidence presented, the Court enters its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiff Nicholas T. Scott ("Scott") brought this action to recover an overpayment of federal income taxes for 1984. On November 28, 1989, by filing a tax return for the 1984 taxable year, Scott made his refund claim to the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). The IRS refused Scott's refund claim, asserting that the statute of limitations for filing it had expired. Scott contends that equitable tolling principles prevent his refund claim from being time-barred. He specifically argues that from the time his 1984 tax return was due to the time he actually filed that return, he suffered from severe alcoholism, which caused him to be mentally incompetent and incapable of filing a tax return. Thus, the central issues in this case are whether Scott was incompetent from the time his 1984 tax return was due to the time he actually filed that return, and, if so, whether his incompetency tolls the statute of limitations.
As an initial matter, this Court holds that any finding of fact which may be deemed, in whole or in part, more properly a conclusion of law shall be deemed as such, and any conclusion of law which may be deemed, in whole or in part, more properly a finding of fact shall be deemed as such.
3. Prior to that time, around 1980, Scott gave a power of attorney to his father, Gene Scott. Gene Scott demanded the power of attorney when he learned that Scott had failed to file and pay federal income tax for previous years.
4. During 1984, in accordance with the terms of the power of attorney, Gene Scott made federal tax deposits on Scott's behalf. In December 1984 or January 1985, Gene Scott revoked the power of attorney by tearing it up. At the time he tore up the power of attorney, Gene Scott insisted that Scott make his last estimated tax payment for 1984, which was due in January 1985. Scott made the final payment in a timely fashion.
5. Scott paid a total of $30,096.00 to the IRS for application to his 1984 federal income taxes.
6. Scott had no tax liability for 1984.
7. Scott's 1984 tax return was due on April 15, 1985.
8. Scott filed a tax return for the 1984 taxable year on November 29, 1989. Through that tax return, Scott sought a refund of the $30,096.00, plus interest.
9. The IRS denied the claim for refund, maintaining that the statute of limitations for filing a refund claim had expired. The United States cites the applicable statute of limitations as 28 U.S.C. § 6511.
10. On January 8, 1992, shortly after the IRS denied his claim, Scott filed this action to recover the overpayment of the $30,096.00, plus interest. Scott asserts that his refund claim is not time-barred under equitable tolling principles because, from the time his 1984 tax return was due to the time he actually filed that return, he was mentally incompetent as a result of his alcoholism.
11. From the early 1980's through at least early November 1989, Scott was a severe alcoholic. Scott presented testimony from several witnesses chronicling his alcoholism. The evidence of Scott's alcoholism is overwhelming. Below are examples of this evidence:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Webb v. U.S.
...F.Supp. 1283, 1287-89 (C.D.Cal.1994) (equitable tolling inapplicable), appeal pending, No. 94-56424 (9th Cir.); Scott v. United States, 847 F.Supp. 1499, 1504-07 (D.Haw.1993) (tolling applies; Sec. 6511 equitably tolled by taxpayer's alcoholism), appeals pending, Nos. 94-15321, 94-15323 (9t......
- Bangkok Broad. & T. v. Co.
-
Ellison v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Civil No. 94-00891 ACK.
...allowing the deadline to pass. In addition, even assuming mental incapacity can toll the 90 day period, see, e.g., Scott v. United States, 847 F.Supp. 1499 (D.Haw. 1993), aff'd, 70 F.3d 120 (9th Cir.1995), the Court finds there is no genuine issue of equitable tolling by reason of mental in......
-
First Interstate Bank of Nevada v. US
...1028 (permitting equitable tolling of Section 6511's limitations period for severe and chronic alcoholism); Scott v. United States, 847 F.Supp. 1499 (D.Hawaii 1993) ("Scott II") (same); Wiltgen v. United States, 813 F.Supp. 1387 (N.D.Iowa 1992) (permitting equitable tolling of Section 6511'......