Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land Co.

Decision Date02 February 1925
Docket Number11147.
Citation76 Colo. 597,233 P. 831
PartiesSCROGGS et al. v. HARKNESS HEIGHTS LAND CO.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1925.

Department 2.

Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; Julian H. Moore, Judge.

Action by the Harkness Heights Land Company against Roy Scroggs and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Louise C. Anderson brings error.

Supersedeas denied, and judgment affirmed.

T. E. Anderson, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

T. E. Watters and Percy S. Morris, both of Denver, for defendant in error.

DENISON, J.

The defendant in error was plaintiff below and had a decree quieting its title to a lot in Denver. Louise C. Anderson, one of the defendants below, alone assigns error.

Mrs. Anderson claims under one Addis, who had an unrecorded contract of purchase from the plaintiff company in whom the title stood of record. Payments were defaulted, and, after 30 days' notice to all parties, including Mrs. Anderson, to come in and pay, and failure by all to do so, the company took possession.

The claim of plaintiff in error is that she was misled into the purchase of the lot by the conduct of the plaintiff in holding out Addis as the owner, but the evidence is that her son and agent, who conducted the transaction for her, had actual and previous notice of the plaintiff's title and of the fact that Addis held only by contract.

Supersedeas denied, and judgment affirmed.

ALLEN, C.J., and WHITFORD, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Terre Grande, Inc. v. Four Corners Oil & Minerals Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • January 10, 1967
    ...to the present one. Mr. Justice Denison, who wrote the opinion, also wrote the opinions in Roller v. Smith, supra, and Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land Co., supra. The contracts in those cases and in Schiffner v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., supra, and Ruth v. Smith, supra, were so obviously ......
  • Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • February 8, 1943
    ... ... Chase, being the owner in fee of ... two quarter sections of land in Weld County, entered into a ... contract of purchase and sale with ... Coal Company. Scroggs et al. v. Harkness Heights Land ... Co., 76 Colo. 597, 233 P. 831; Bishop ... ...
  • American Mortg. Co. v. Logan
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • January 21, 1932
    ... ... Company to have a certain contract for the sale of farm land ... in Larimer county annulled, to remove from their title to the ... section 275 of the Code. Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land ... Co., 76 Colo. 597, 233 P. 831. In the ... ...
  • Ocrant v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc., 74-1012
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • September 18, 1974
    ...the continuing agency relationship between him and his wife, that knowledge must be imputed to Mrs. Ocrant. Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land Co., 76 Colo. 597, 233 P. 831 (Colo.). Throughout the period in question Mrs. Ocrant demonstrated a continuing reluctance to familiarize herself with ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT