Seaboard Machinery Corporation v. United States
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | Seaboard Machinery Corporation v. United States, 358 U.S. 932, 79 S.Ct. 320, 3 L.Ed.2d 304 (1959) |
| Decision Date | 12 January 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 544,544 |
| Parties | SEABOARD MACHINERY CORPORATION, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America |
Messrs. Leo L. Foster and Charles M. Trammell, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Mr. Samuel D. Slade, for the United States.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
63 cases
-
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez
...of religion under First and Fourteenth Amendments); Barta v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, 259 F.2d 553 (CA8 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 932, 79 S.Ct. 320, 3 L.Ed.2d 304 (1959) (Fourteenth Amendment). See also Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915, 919 (CA10 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960......
-
Corbett v. Patterson
... ... Civ. A. 67-C-25 ... United States District Court D. Colorado ... July 3, 1967. 272 ... ...
-
Groban v. SS PEGU
... ... Nos. 63 Ad 516, 63 Civ. 1030 ... United States District Court, S. D. New York ... July 23, 1971 ... (SLDC), a British corporation, consigned aboard the S. S. Pegu to Groban Supply Company ... , as these terms were generally understood in the machinery trade, by Groban, Union and SLDC, and within the meaning of ... 1969); Insurance Co. of North America v. Seaboard Homes, Inc., 51 Misc.2d 486, 273 N.Y.S.2d 470 (Sup.Ct ... ...
- United States v. Williams
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Tribal incorporation of First Amendment norms: a case study of the Indian tribes of South Dakota.
...529, 533 (8th Cir. 1967); Native American Church, 272 F.2d 131; Barta v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, 259 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 932 (1959); Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915, 919 (10th Cir. 1957); Keeler, 442 F.2d at 678. The Court in Martinez did, however, reaf......
-
CHAPTER 12 NATIVE AMERICAN JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING
...49, 56 (1978). [259] Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896). [260] Barta v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, 259 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 932 (1959). [261] Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 56 (1978). [262] Pub.L. 90-284, 82 Stat. 77, now codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1301 -1......
-
Section 3.7 Judicial Admissions During Trial
...them. See: · Sebree v. Rosen, 393 S.W.2d 590, 602 (Mo. 1965) · Wehrli v. Wabash R.R. Co., 315 S.W.2d 765, 774 (Mo. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 932 (1959) · Vogrin v. Forum Cafeterias of Am., Inc., 308 S.W.2d 617, 621 (Mo. 1957) Colloquy stated into the record between counsel at trial may ......
-
Section 3.2 True Judicial Admissions
...· Jenkins v. Wabash R.R. Co., 322 S.W.2d 788, 794 (Mo. 1959) · Wehrli v. Wabash R.R. Co., 315 S.W.2d 765, 774 (Mo. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 932 (1959) A judicial admission includes stipulations, statements made by parties and counsel, and other formal statements during trial. See: · Ch......
Get Started for Free
1 provisions
-
28 APPENDIX U.S.C. § 58 Entering Judgment
...Co., 255 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1958); Barta v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, 259 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 932, 79 S.Ct. 320, 3 L.Ed.2d 304 (1959); Beacon Fed. S. & L. Assn. v. Federal Home L. Bank Bd., 266 F.2d 246 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 823, 80 S.Ct. 70, 4 L.Ed.2d 67 ......