Seabolt v. State, 29889

Decision Date06 May 1975
Docket NumberNo. 29889,29889
Citation234 Ga. 356,216 S.E.2d 110
PartiesJohnny SEABOLT v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Wynn Pelham, Lawrenceville, for appellant.

Bryant Huff, Dist. Atty., Dawson Jackson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lawrenceville, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Lois F. Oakley, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justice.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced for armed robbery. He appeals the denial of his motion for directed verdict and the denial of his motion for new trial on the general grounds. Held:

1. The ground of the motion for directed verdict is fatal variance. Appellant contends he was indicted for armed robbery of 'forty-five dollars ($45.00) in U.S. currently' and the state failed to prove the money taken was U.S. currency. The victim testified that appellant took his wallet from his pocket which, among other items, contained forty-five dollars.

As stated in DePalma v. State, 225 Ga. 465, 469, 169 S.E.2d 801, 805, 'We have not been able to locate any Georgia cases which set out a general rule to be applied in the determination of whether or not a variance between the allegation and the proof is so material that it is fatal. The United States Supreme Court, however, has evolved a criterion which seems to us to be reasonable. 'The general rule that allegations and proof must correspond is based upon the obvious requirements (1) that the accused shall be definitely informed as to the charges against him, so that he may be enabled to present his defense and not be taken by surprise by the evidence offered at the trial; and (2) that he may be protected against another prosecution for the same offense.' . . . Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 82 (55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314).' Appellant here was not subjected to either of these dangers and we find no error. See Bell v. State, 227 Ga. 800, 802, 183 S.E.2d 357.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. The victim testified he had known the appellant for many years; that the appellant took his (the victim's) wallet from his pocket while an accomplice 'threw' a gun on him and threatened to shoot him if he did not hand over his money.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Caldwell v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 1976
    ...786, 77 S.E.2d 769.3 Bell v. State, 227 Ga. 800, 801, 183 S.E.2d 357; Colton v. State, 231 Ga. 502, 202 S.E.2d 444; Seabolt v. State, 234 Ga. 356(1), 216 S.E.2d 110; Dobbs v. State, 235 Ga. 800, 801, 221 S.E.2d 576; Matthews v. State, 236 Ga. 867, 225 S.E.2d 896; Reece v. State, 125 Ga.App.......
  • Ingram v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 29, 1976
    ... ... Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78(82), 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314.' See also Seabolt v. State, ... 234 Ga. 356, 216 S.E.2d 110; Reece v. State, 125 Ga.App. 49, 186 S.E.2d 502; McHugh v. State, 136 Ga.App. 57, 220 S.E.2d 69. In the ... ...
  • Oglesby v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • May 30, 1979
    ...at trial, and so that he may be protected against another prosecution for the same offense. DePalma v. State, supra; Seabolt v. State, 234 Ga. 356, 216 S.E.2d 110 (1975); Dobbs v. State, 235 Ga. 800(3), 221 S.E.2d 576 (1976); Byers v. State, 236 Ga. 599(1), 225 S.E.2d 26 (1976); Hamby v. St......
  • Osborn v. State, 62988
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 11, 1982
    ...the indictment was not subject to dismissal. See generally Hopper v. Hampton, 244 Ga. 361, 362, 260 S.E.2d 73 (1979); Seabolt v. State, 234 Ga. 356, 216 S.E.2d 110 (1975); DePalma v. State, 225 Ga. 465, 469, 169 S.E.2d 801 (1969). It follows that any error committed by the trial court in re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT