Sears v. Braswell
Decision Date | 09 October 1929 |
Docket Number | 57. |
Parties | SEARS et al. v. BRASWELL et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Nash County; Small, Judge.
Suit by C. W. Sears and others against Mrs. Alice S. Braswell and others, in which defendants counterclaimed. Decree for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. No error.
Refusal of plaintiffs' request to restrict evidence introduced by plaintiffs of deeds on which defendants relied to proof of title from common source held not error.
Material facts:
In the course of the trial it was admitted of record by all parties:
(a) The land in controversy is the identical tract of land described in the deed from Robert D. McIlwaine and others to Wells Draughan, recorded in Book 26, p. 559, Nash County Registry and described in the seventh item of the will of Wells Draughan, recorded in Will Book 9, p. 277, of the clerk's office in Nash county, and is the same land as described in the deed from James W. Draughan, executor, to Richard H Jones, recorded in Book 28, p. 246, Nash Registry, and in deeds from Richard H. Jones and wife, to Thomas P. Braswell Book 28, p. 11, and to H. E. Odom, Book 26, p. 602, and from H. E. Odom, trustee, to Thomas P. Braswell, Book 38, p. 46 of Nash County Registry.
(b) That Thomas Sears, mentioned in the seventh item of the will of Wells Draughan above referred to, died on the -- day of April, 1926, never having married and never having had any lawful issue or heir of his body.
(c) That the plaintiffs in this action are all surviving heirs of Delphia Sears, deceased.
(d) That the interest of Thomas P. Braswell in the above-described land passed by his will, recorded in the clerk's office of Nash county, to his three sons, M. C., M. R., and J. C. Braswell, and that, by deed of M. R. and J. C. Braswell to M. C. Braswell, 140 acres of said land was conveyed, and the remaining 45 acres continued to be held in common; that, upon the death of M. C. Braswell, intestate, in 1922, his interest in all the aforesaid land, the entire 185 acres, descended to the defendants Vivian Braswell, Mattie May Gorham, Alice Bryan Braswell, and Elizabeth Braswell, subject to the dower of Mrs. Alice S. Braswell, widow of M. C. Braswell, deceased, the defendants in this action.
Upon evidence introduced by both sides, the following issues were submitted to the jury, the first four being answered by the jury and the last two by the court, to wit:
(e) The seventh item of the will of Wells Draughan is as follows:
(f) Plaintiffs introduced in evidence the following:
Deed from James W. Draughan, executor, to Richard H. Jones, recorded in Book 28 at page 246, Nash County Registry, which reads as follows:
Deed from Richard H. Jones and wife to Thos. P. Braswell, recorded in Book 28 at page 11, Nash County Registry. The material parts of this deed are as follows: Dated November 13, 1872, acknowledged November 15, 1872, recorded May 6, 1873. Consideration $500, containing by estimation, 140 acres, more or less, and being a part of the McIlwaine tract. "The following described tract or parcel of land situate in the County of Nash, State of North Carolina, being a part of the tract purchased by said Jones of Wells Draughan, deceased, the whole of which tract was purchased by said Wells Draughan of McIlwaine" (the tract in controversy). Contains general warranty.
Mortgage, Richard H. Jones to H. E. Odom, recorded in Book 26, at page 602, Nash County Registry. The material parts of said mortgage are as follows: Dated November 13, 1872, acknowledged November 27, 1872, and recorded January 2, 1873, mortgage recites: "Witnesseth, that whereas, said H. E. Odom is security for Richard H. Jones on a certain bond due James W. Draughan for the purchase of the following described tract or parcel of land given this day and due January 1st, 1874, and bearing interest from January 1st, 1873, the amount of principal of said bond being Seven Hundred and Seventy Dollars and whereas the said Richard H. Jones and Harriet A. are desirous of securing and saving the said H. E. Odom on account of said securityship, so that he will not be loser thereby," etc., containing 45 acres, more or less, and being the balance of the McIlwaine tract. This description begins: "The tract of land on which R. H. Jones now resides purchased by him of the late Wells Draughan with the exception of that part sold to Thos. O. Braswell this day, the part hereby conveyed and sold to said Odom being bounded as follows." The land described is part of the land in controversy.
Deed, H. E. Odom, mortgagee or trustee, to Thos. P. Braswell, Book 38, p. 46, Nash County Registry.
The evidence was introduced by plaintiffs to show defendants' chain of title from a common source.
Plaintiffs' counsel dictated to the record the following statement: "All of the evidence introduced showing defendants' chain of title was introduced for the purpose of showing title from common source, and that plaintiffs' title from that source is superior to defendants' title from that source, and evidence restricted to that purpose." Motion by defendants to strike from record the above statement and restrictions. Motion allowed; (1) plaintiffs except and assign error.
Defendants' evidence, in part:
Defendants introduced in evidence a certified copy from Edgecombe superior court, of the qualification of James W. Draughan, executor of Wells Draughan, deceased.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Owens v. Blackwood Lumber Co.
... ... years, under statutes before set forth. Thompson v ... Buchanan, 195 N.C. 155, 160, 161, 141 S.E. 580; Sears v ... Braswell, 197 N.C. 515, 149 S.E. 846." Owens v ... Lumber Co., supra, 210 N.C. 504, 513, 187 S.E. 804, 809, ... Nicholson v. Lumber Co., ... ...
-
Cauble v. Trexler
... ... Rhea, 82 Kan. 109, 107 P. 799, 136 ... Am.St.Rep. 100, 20 Ann.Cas. 42. See also Cauley v ... Sutton, 150 N.C. 327, 64 S.E. 3, and Sears" v ... Braswell, 197 N.C. 515, 149 S.E. 846 ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Owens v. Blackwood Lumber Co., Inc.
... ... possession for 20 or 30 years, under statutes before set ... forth. Thompson v. Buchanan, 195 N.C. 155, 160, 161, ... 141 S.E. 580; Sears ... forth. Thompson v. Buchanan, 195 N.C. 155, 160, 161, ... 141 S.E. 580; Sears v. Braswell ... ...