Seay v. State

Decision Date03 December 1951
Docket NumberNo. 38219,38219
Citation55 So.2d 430,212 Miss. 712
PartiesSEAY v. STATE.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Ely B. Mitchell, Corinth, for appellant.

J. P. Coleman, Atty. Gen., Joe T. Patterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

McGEHEE, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Shelton Seay, who is a Negro, was tried and convicted for a felonious assault upon C. L. Pace, Jr., sheriff of Tishomingo County, by shooting at the said officer with a pistol from ambush in the nighttime. The said defendant was sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the state penitentiary on the ground that the shooting was done with intent to kill and murder, although the indictment does not specifically charge such intent.

The validity of the indictment was challenged not on the ground of any alleged insufficiency of its averments, but rather by a motion to quash the same on the ground that the jurors who served on the grand jury that returned the indictment were not selected in the manner required by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in that no Negro had served as a grand or petit juror in Tishomingo County during the last fifty years, and that the members of this race had been continuously and systematically excluded from jury service by the board of supervisors having failed or refused to place their names in the jury boxes on account of their race, even though a goodly number of Negroes were shown to be qualified electors and eligible for jury service. The motion to quash the indictment was made on the further ground that there were two separate and distinct offenses or crimes charged in the same indictment, but which ground, if well taken, we think should have been raised by demurrer as a defect appearing on the face of the indictment.

On this appeal we do not reach the merits of the case since the proof disclosed without dispute that there was a Negro population of approximately 1,000 in the county, and that there were quite a number of Negro male qualified electors in the county who were eligible for jury service under the requirements of Section 1762, Code of 1942, as registered and qualified electors, in the absence of a showing that they possessed some of the disqualifications enumerated in this statute, or were not men of fair intelligence, sound judgment and good character. Such a showing was not made, and under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Patton v. State of Mississippi, 332 U.S. 463, 68 S.Ct. 184, 187, 92 L.Ed. 76, the proof by a Negro defendant on a charge for an offense against a white person, that no Negro had served on a grand jury for the past 30 years is 'very strong evidence of purposeful racial discrimination' in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which the State has the burden of disproving by showing that the names of Negroes were not placed in the jury box for some other reason than the fact that they are Negroes.

In the instant case the defendant introduced in support of his motion to quash the indictment three former county superintendents of education, two former circuit clerks, three former sheriffs, the then tax assessor, and all of the members of the board of supervisors, whose testimony disclosed that the name of no Negro had been placed in the jury box out of which the grand and petit...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Winters v. Cook
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 28, 1973
    ...cert. denied, 339 U.S. 946, 70 S.Ct. 800, 94 L.Ed. 1360 (1950); Ferrell v. State, 208 Miss. 539, 45 So.2d 127 (1950); Seay v. State, 212 Miss. 712, 55 So.2d 430 (1951); Durr v. State, 214 Miss. 658, 59 So.2d 304 (1952); Wheeler v. State, 219 Miss. 129, 63 So.2d 517, cert. denied, 346 U. S. ......
  • Harper v. State, 42767
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 25, 1965
    ...Goldsby v. Harpole, 263 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1959), certiorari denied, 361 U.S. 838, 80 S.Ct. 58, 4 L.Ed.2d 78 (1959); Seay v. State, 212 Miss. 712, 55 So.2d 430 (1951); Patton v. State of Mississippi, 332 U.S. 463, 68 S.Ct. 184, 92 L.Ed. 76, 1 A.L.R.2d 1286 (1947); Annots., 94 L.Ed. 856 (1950......
  • Kennard v. State, 41890
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1961
    ...of 1942. The same opinion recognized that it is not required that all the names of Negroes be placed in the jury box. In Seay v. State, 212 Miss. 712, 55 So.2d 430, this Court applied the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Patton v. Mississippi, supra, and reversed the co......
  • Cameron v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 28, 1958
    ...or not the qualified electors met the requirements for jury service to both white and Negro men alike. In the case of Seay v. State, 212 Miss. 712, 55 So.2d 430, 431, the record disclosed that the name of no Negro had been placed in the jury box out of which the grand and petit juries had b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT