Seay v. State, A95A2631
| Decision Date | 01 March 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. A95A2631,A95A2631 |
| Citation | 220 Ga.App. 418,469 S.E.2d 496 |
| Parties | SEAY v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Appointment of counsel. Rockdale Superior Court. Before Judge Vaughn.
Joseph F. Bertollo, Marietta, for appellant.
Cheryl F. Custer, District Attorney, Richard R. Read, Assistant District Attorney, Conyers, for appellee.
HAROLD R. BANKE, Senior Appellate Judge.
Dwight Olen Seay was convicted of two counts of child molestation in January 1994. His sole enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in ruling that he was not entitled to appointed counsel on appeal.
Seventeen months after his conviction, Seay filed a motion for out-of-time appeal, arguing that the failure of his retained trial counsel and the court to inform him of his right, as an indigent, to appointed appellate counsel prevented him from filing a timely appeal and violated his rights to counsel and due process. After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion, finding that Seay was not harmed by the failure to inform him of his right to appointed appellate counsel because he was not indigent during the time that an appeal could have been timely filed. Held:
Without question, criminal defendants are entitled to counsel at every critical stage of the proceedings against them, including appeal. Wood v. State, 199 Ga.App. 252, 253(1), 404 S.E.2d 589 (1991). Defendants "unable, without undue hardship, to employ the legal services of an attorney or to defray the necessary expenses of legal representation" are indigent and therefore entitled to appointed counsel. OCGA § 17-12-2(5). But where a defendant retains trial counsel and then claims indigence on appeal, he bears the burden of making that fact known to the trial court or some responsible state official. Hopkins v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 236, 238, 215 S.E.2d 241 (1975). "If the trial court has no reason to believe that the defendant is indigent and cannot afford the services of retained counsel for the purpose of appeal, it is under no duty to inquire as to the defendant's indigence and may presume that his retained counsel will protect his appellate rights." Id.
It is undisputed that Seay was not informed that indigents are entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. The record shows, however, that Seay failed to make his alleged indigence known, even to his trial counsel. Moreover, Seay possessed assets which could have been converted easily to cash by sale or mortgage sufficient to mount an appeal and was...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fortson v. State
...a motion to withdraw a guilty plea involves intricacies of the law and advocacy by the State against the defendant. Seay v. State, 220 Ga.App. 418, 419, 469 S.E.2d 496 (1996). See, e.g., Caine v. State, 266 Ga. 421, 467 S.E.2d 570 (1996), (motion to withdraw plea is an appropriate vehicle f......
-
McQueen v. State
...expenses of legal representation" are indigent and therefore entitled to appointed counsel. OCGA § 17-12-2(5); Seay v. State, 220 Ga.App. 418, 419, 469 S.E.2d 496 (1996). "The determination of indigency calls for the exercise of discretion based upon consideration of relevant criteria of in......
-
Hawkins v. State, A96A0991
...and may presume that his retained counsel will protect his appellate rights." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Seay v. State, 220 Ga.App. 418, 419, 469 S.E.2d 496 (1996). In Seay v. State, we relied upon Hopkins v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 236, 215 S.E.2d 241 (1975) to determine that once a defen......
-
Watkins v. State
...and may presume that his retained counsel will protect his appellate rights.(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Seay v. State , 220 Ga.App. 418, 419, 469 S.E.2d 496 (1996). See also Massey v. State , 278 Ga.App. 303, 305–306 (2), 628 S.E.2d 706 (2006). As Watkins was represented by retained......