Sebastian v. Carroll
Decision Date | 03 January 1968 |
Citation | 233 N.E.2d 208,353 Mass. 465 |
Parties | Constance B. SEBASTIAN v. Francis X. CARROLL. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Ira L. Lipman, Brockton, for Constance B. Sebastian.
Louis Barsky, Boston, for Francis X. Carroll.
Before WILKINS, C.J., and WHITTEMORE, KIRK, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.
This bill in equity to establish a constructive trust in certain land in Pembroke in Plymouth County was first brought in the Probate Court, Plymouth County, on September 2, 1966. The defendant entered his appearance and on September 12, 1966, filed a notice of removal to the Superior Court, Suffolk County, and on that date the case was accordingly transferred. In the Superior Court the case was consolidated for trial with two other related cases in which the defendant here was the plaintiff. After hearing, a judge in the Superior Court entered a final decree dismissing the bill. The plaintiff appealed.
The plaintiff's main contention before us is that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction, and that the case should be remanded to the Probate Court for a new hearing.
By St.1963, c. 820, entitled, 'An Act providing that probate courts shall be courts of general equity jurisdiction,' § 6 of G.L. c. 215 was amended. The principal change was the addition of a first paragraph, which in material part provides: with exceptions of no present pertinence.
The second paragraph of the amended § 6 is the same as before the amendment except for adding the word 'also' (in supplied italics) in the quotation below. In relevant part, the second paragraph reads: 'Probate courts shall also have jurisdiction in equity * * * of all cases and matters relative to the administration of the estates of deceased persons, to wills, * * * to trusts created by will or other written instrument and, in cases involving in any way the estate of a deceased person or the property of an absentee whereof a receiver has been appointed under chapter two hundred or the property of a person under guardianship or conservatorship, to trusts created by parol or constructive or resulting trusts.'
This court has strictly construed statutory provisions extending the equity jurisdiction of the Probate Courts. See Derby v. Derby, 248 Mass. 310, 314, 142 N.E. 786; Wellesley College v. Attorney Gen., 313 Mass. 722, 725--726, 49 N.E.2d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spence v. Reeder
...Co., 366 Mass. 376, 379, 318 N.E.2d 827 (1974) (waiver of evidentiary trial in a contempt proceeding); Sebastian v. Carroll, 353 Mass. 465, 468, 233 N.E.2d 208 (1968) (waiver of right to remove case to another court); Huntoon v. Quincy, 349 Mass. 9, 16, 206 N.E.2d 63 (1965) (waiver of defec......
-
Com. v. Aldoupolis
...has furthermore relinquished this right by consenting to the defendants' motion for the venue transfer. Cf. Sebastian v. Carroll, 353 Mass. 465, 468, 233 N.E.2d 208 (1968) (in civil case, plaintiff waives venue where defendant has removed action to different county and plaintiff proceeds to......
- Com. v. Saville
-
Wood v. Wood
...extending their equity jurisdiction. Davenport v. Attorney Gen., 361 Mass. 372, 379, 280 N.E.2d 193 (1972); Sebastian v. Carroll, 353 Mass. 465, 467, 233 N.E.2d 208 (1968), and cases cited. By St.1963, c. 820, § 1, however, G.L. c. 215, § 6, was rewritten to insert a new first paragraph con......