Second Religious Soc. v. Harriman
Decision Date | 05 September 1878 |
Citation | 125 Mass. 321 |
Parties | Second Religious Society of Boxford v. Daniel F. Harriman |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Argued November 8, 1877 [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]
Essex. Contract for money had and received. Writ dated April 29, 1875. The answer set up the statute of limitations. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the defendant, to this court, on appeal, on agreed facts in substance as follows:
The will of Ephraim Foster of Boxford, dated January 3, 1835, contained, besides other provisions, the following:
The testator died on February 5, 1835, and the will was admitted to probate on March 10, 1835. His widow died in May, 1864.
The records of the Second Parish in Boxford, which was the West Parish, contain no mention of this legacy, until the warrant dated May 27, 1864, for a legal meeting of the voters of the parish, on June 6, 1864, which contained the following article:
At this meeting duly held on June 6, it was voted: "To accept the legacy given the West Parish in Boxford, by the late Ephraim Foster, and to choose a committee to receive and expend the same as the parish shall instruct;" and Daniel F. Harriman, John F. Kimball, and Joshua T. Day, were chosen a committee. Of this committee, Harriman is the defendant. Kimball has not resided in the parish for five years and has no interest in the society, and Day is dead.
The next mention of said legacy in the parish records is in the warrant, dated May 11, 1865, calling a meeting of the voters of the parish on May 19, and containing the following articles:
At this meeting held on May 19, 1865, it was voted "To instruct the committee to purchase the land and house according to the letter of the will." "That the parish relinquish the legacy bequeathed by the late Ephraim Foster to the West Parish in Boxford for educational purposes to what has been known as the Seventh School District in Boxford." "That the parish relinquish, to what has been known as the Seventh School District in Boxford, the interest which has accrued upon the fund bequeathed by the late Ephraim Foster to the West Parish in Boxford for educational purposes."
The Seventh School District was the nearest to the meeting-house named in the will.
A warrant dated June 24, 1865, called a meeting of the voters of the parish on July 1, 1865, to act upon, among others, the following articles:
At this meeting duly held on July 1, 1865, the following votes were passed:
Nothing further was done in reference to the fund by the parish, nor was the committee ever discharged, nor did they ever make a report to the parish, after the date of the last mentioned meeting.
At a legal meeting of the voters of the parish held in pursuance of a warrant, "to see what action the parish will take in regard to fund left by the late Ephraim Foster for the support of a school," held on April 6, 1875, it was
"Voted, That a committee of three be chosen by the parish to take all necessary steps for the legal procurement and acceptance of the fund bequeathed the parish by Ephraim Foster for educational purposes now in the hands of Daniel F. Harriman;" and M. S. Jenkins, Isaac W. Archer, Nathaniel Gage, were chosen as the committee. On April 29, 1875, this committee by its chairman demanded, in behalf of the parish, the fund of the defendant, and the defendant declined to pay it, except upon a decree of the court as to whom it belonged.
At a town meeting called and held in Boxford, on March 6, 1865, "to see if the town will vote to unite the fifth, sixth and seventh school districts, or to unite either the fifth or sixth school district with the seventh, or take any action on the subject; by request of Daniel F. Harriman and others," it was voted "to unite the fifth and seventh school districts."
At a town meeting called and held on March 22, 1865, "to see if the town will make null and void the vote whereby the fifth and seventh school districts were united at the last annual town meeting," it was voted "to make null and void the vote, whereby the fifth and seventh school districts were united at the last annual town meeting."
The fifth, sixth and seventh school districts were contiguous, and the only districts in the West Parish.
The records of the Seventh School District in Boxford show that a warrant dated July 1, 1865, for a meeting of the voters in the district, contained the following articles: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shattuck v. Wood Memorial Home
... ... Visitors, 253 Mass. 256 , 298. Boxford Religious ... Society v. Harriman, 125 Mass. 321 , 329 ... The ... ...
-
Massachusetts Charitable Mech. Ass'n v. Beede
...new trustees for themselves. Harvard College v. Society for Promoting Theological Education, 3 Gray 280;Second Religious Society of Boxford v. Harriman, 125 Mass. 321, 328;Winthrop v. Attorney General, 128 Mass. 258;Morville v. Fowle, 144 Mass. 109, 10 N.E. 766;Dickey v. Trustees of Putnam ......
-
Massachusetts Charitable Mechanic Ass'n v. Beede
... ... In view of the ... fact, however, that this is the second attempt to obtain a ... decision from this court upon the question ... Theological Education, 3 Gray, 280. Second Religious ... Society of Boxford v. Harriman, 125 Mass. 321 , 328 ... Winthrop ... ...
-
Greenfield Savings Bank v. Abercrombie
... ... some instances money was lent on second mortgages. It is ... alleged also that the rules (which are specified in ... 377; ... Jones v. McDermott, 114 Mass. 400; Boxford ... Religious Society v. Harriman, ... [211 Mass. 260] ... 125 Mass. 321; Potter v ... ...