Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Security Bank, N.A. v. BellSouth Advertising & Pub. Corp.

Document Cited authorities 51 Cited in 34 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date24 July 1996
Docket NumberNo. 94-2166,94-2166
Citation679 So.2d 795
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D1673 SECURITY BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 cases
  • Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 23, 2022
    ...summary judgment ... is ... permissible" if "there is no disputed issue of material fact." Sec. Bank, N.A. v. BellSouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. , 679 So. 2d 795, 800 n.5 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1996). See also Zelaya/Cap. Int'l Judgment, LLC v. Zelaya , 769 F.3d 1296, 1304 (11th Cir. 2014) (......
  • Ciprian-Escapa v. City of Orlando
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 17, 2015
    ...(citing Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH Cellular, 957 So.2d 662, 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ); see also Sec. Bank, N.A. v. BellSouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp., 679 So.2d 795, 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). A “defaulting party has a due process entitlement to notice and an opportunity to be heard as to the......
  • Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Sawh
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 2016
    ...damages without the required notice and without proof is regarded as fundamental error.” Security Bank, N.A. v. BellSouth Adver. & Publ'g Corp., 679 So.2d 795, 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), approved, 698 So.2d 254, 256 (Fla.1997) ; see also Williams v. Direct Dispensing, Inc., 630 So.2d 1195 (Fla......
  • Wells Fargo Bank v. Sawh
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 2016
    ...damages without the required notice and without proof is regarded as fundamental error." Security Bank, N.A. v. BellSouth Adver. & Publ'g Corp., 679 So. 2d 795, 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), approved, 698 So. 2d 254, 256 (Fla. 1997); see alsoWilliams v. Direct Dispensing, Inc., 630 So. 2d 1195 (F......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Pop quiz: why is fundamental error like pornography?
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 76 No. 10, November - November 2002
    • November 1, 2002
    ...So. 2d 207 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1996). (21) Vestal, 731 So. 2d at 829. (22) See Security Bank, N.A. v. Bell South Adver. & Publ'g Corp., 679 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. (23) See Hooters of America, Inc. v. Carolina Wings, Inc., 655 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1995). (24) See, e.g., Norville......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT