Security Finance Co. v. Gentry
Decision Date | 02 June 1926 |
Citation | 91 Fla. 1015,109 So. 220 |
Parties | SECURITY FINANCE CO. v. GENTRY et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Escambia County; A. G. Campbell, Judge.
Action by the Security Finance Company against Walter H. Gentry and others, formerly trading as the Home Bakery. An order of the circuit judge in effect denied a motion to set aside an affidavit of the illegality of an execution, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
Syllabus by the Court
Clerk's authority is entirely statutory, and his official action, to be binding on others, must be in conformity with statute entry of default in book designated as 'rules judgment docket No. 7' does not comply with statutes which require clerk to keep default docket and enter all defaults in full therein; until default has been entered in default docket 60-day period in which defendant may move to vacate, default does not begin to run (Rev. Gen. St. 1920, § 3076). The clerk's authority is entirely statutory, and his official action, to be binding upon others, must be in conformity with the statutes. The record shows that default in this case was entered in a book designated as 'rules judgment docket No. 7.' This does not comply with the statutes; the statutes require the clerk to keep a 'default docket,' and to enter all defaults in full in such docket. Until the default has been entered in such docket the 60-day period in which a defendant may move to vacate a default does not begin to run.
Clerk of court should not enter final judgment on default where declaration and cause of action attached show action one at law where testimony is necessary to ascertain damages, but proper practice is for such damages to be assessed by jury. The declaration and cause of action attached thereto shows this to be an action at law where testimony is necessary for the ascertainment of damages if any at all are recoverable under the allegations of the declaration. A clerk of the circuit court is not authorized to enter final judgment on default in such cases. The proper practice is for such damages to be assessed by a jury.
Leroy v. Holsberry and L. V. Trueman, both of Pensacola, for plaintiff in error.
Forsyth Caro, of Pensacola, for defendants in error.
This case is on writ of error to the circuit court of Escambia county from an order of the circuit judge that in effect denied a motion to set aside an affidavit of illegality of execution. The denial of the motion is in effect a final judgment in the proceedings attacking the execution from which writ of error will lie.
The declaration was in the following language:
'Wherefore it sues.
'Attorneys for Plaintiff.
'Exhibit A.
'$231.00.
'Pensacola, Florida, 4/28, 1923.
For value received, I promise to pay to the order of J. D. Anderson two hundred thirty-one dollars, payable in installments as indicated in schedule, with interest on each installment after its maturity at the rate of 10 per cent. per annum.
'If any installment of this note remains unpaid for more than three days after its maturity, the entire amount unpaid shall become due and payable forthwith, at the election of the holder of the note. This note is given covering deferred installments under conditional sales contract of even date for a motor vehicle. All makers, indorsers, and persons now or hereafter becoming parties hereto, hereby waive demand and protest, and notice of demand, nonpayment, and protest. And they each severally agree to pay all costs of collection or securing, or attempting to collect or secure this note, including an attorney's fee of $15 and 15 per cent. of the amount so collected or secured, whether the same be collected or secured by suit or otherwise. And all indorsers and sureties agree that this note, or any installment thereof, may, in whole or in part, be extended or renewed from time to time, without notice to them and without release of their liability hereon. This note is negotiable and payable at any bank.
'Home Bakery, W. H. Gentry. [Seal.]
'Schedule of Payments.
$23.10 one month after date. Paid 6/5.
$23.10 two months after date.
$23.10 three months after date.
$23.10 four months after date.
$23.10 five months after date.
$23.10 six months after date.
$23.10 seven months after date.
$23.10 eight months after date.
$23.10 nine months after date.
$23.10 ten months after date.'
Indorsements on back:
'Sold to Security Finance Co., without recourse on me.
J. D. Anderson.
'[1¢ internal revenue stamps canceled '4/30/23 W. H. G.']
'State of Florida, County of Escambia--ss.:
'Hunter Brown,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. and to Use of City of St. Louis v. Priest
... ... drawn from it. Mosely v. Sum, 130 S.W.2d 465, 344 ... Mo. 969; Cento v. Security Bldg. Co., 99 S.W.2d 1; ... Young v. Wheelock, 333 Mo. 992, 64 S.W.2d 950. (b) ... The clerk ... Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Buckner, 201 ... N.C. 78; Securities Finance Co. v. Gentry, 109 So ... 220; Reed v. Turner, 200 N.C. 78; 46 C. J. 10673; ... State ex ... ...
-
State ex rel. St. Louis v. Priest
...the circuit court are controlled by statute. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Buckner, 201 N.C. 78; Securities Finance Co. v. Gentry, 109 So. 220; Reed v. Turner, 200 N.C. 78; 46 C.J. 10673; State ex rel. Walker v. Bus, 36 S.W. 636; Shambaugh County Treas. v. City Bank, 226 N.W. 460, 65 ......
-
Alachua County v. Powers, 51465
...officer deriving his authority and responsibility from both constitutional and statutory provisions. Security Finance Company v. Gentry, 91 Fla. 1015, 109 So. 220 (1926); Article V, Section 16, Florida Article V, Section 16, Florida Constitution, contains the following provisions: "There sh......
-
Cook v. Walgreen Co., 80-1524
...115 Fla. 780, 156 So. 1 (1934); Blake v. R. M. S. Holding Corp., 341 So.2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). But see Security Finance Co. v. Gentry, 91 Fla. 1015, 109 So. 220 (1926) (Where the court clerk was required by statute to keep a default docket, a default did not begin to run until such entr......