Segreti v. Putnam Community Hospital

Citation449 N.Y.S.2d 785,88 A.D.2d 590
PartiesJennie T. SEGRETI, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. PUTNAM COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al., Respondents.
Decision Date03 May 1982
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Glaser & Blitz, New York City (Helen B. Stoller, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Maria & Libertella, White Plains (Joseph A. Maria, White Plains, of counsel), for respondent Putnam Community Hospital.

O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle, Oleson & Collins, White Plains (Richard Oleson and Eugene J. McGuinness, White Plains, of counsel), for respondent Paul Chang.

Before DAMIANI, J. P., and LAZER, MANGANO and GIBBONS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered December 30, 1980, which dismissed the complaint, after a jury verdict in favor of defendant Chang.

Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Putnam County, for a new trial as to defendant Chang.

On January 16, 1976 Anthony Segreti died in his car en route home after having just been X-rayed at the Putnam Community Hospital pursuant to Dr. Chang's suggestion. Although no autopsy was performed, the death certificate of the New York State Department of Health indicated that the immediate cause of death was "coronary occlusion".

Dr. Paul Chang first saw decedent in his office in October, 1970. Decedent revealed that he was experiencing a great deal of tension at work and, with respect to his family history, that his father had died of a coronary at the age of 54 and his mother was suffering from hypertension. Dr. Chang performed an electrocardiogram which revealed both premature ventricular and arterial contractions. Premature contractions can be caused by stress or anxiety or may result from the use of such stimulants as caffeine or tobacco. Chang prescribed a mild tranquilizer at that time. On December 16, 1970 Dr. Chang made the following diagnosis: "abnormal electrocardiogram, frequent p. v. c.' s, no organic heart disease".

Segreti did not visit Dr. Chang again until October 20, 1971, at which time he complained of pain in the precordium and substernum regions. Based upon his observations to this point, Dr. Chang reached the opinion that heart disease was one of a number of possibilities to explain Segreti's ailment. He thereupon prescribed valium, as a mild tranquilizer, and sorbitrate, a medication designed to dilate the coronary artery vessels in order to increase the blood flow. Shortly thereafter, Dr. Chang recommended that Segreti see a cardiologist for the purpose of submitting to a coronary angiogram. No such test was performed, however.

Upon Segreti's next visit, in April, 1972, Dr. Chang prescribed enderal, a medication used for controlling angina, blood pressure and irregular heartbeats. It was also determined that Segreti had an abnormally high cholesterol level.

In June, 1972 Dr. Chang performed a pre-operative electrocardiogram and cleared Segreti for knee surgery. Upon the occasion of Segreti's subsequent hospitalization in January, 1974, Dr. Chang initially refused to clear his patient for further knee surgery due to abnormal wave patterns on the cardiogram. Even at that time, however, he did not consider Segreti to be suffering from heart disease.

In November, 1974, Segreti complained of pressure in his chest and left arm and informed Dr. Chang that his mother had recently died of a massive coronary. Although Dr. Chang became increasingly concerned about Segreti's complaints of chest pains, none of the other common symptoms of heart disease, such as weakness, sensations of heat or cold, sweat or difficulties in breathing were present. An electrocardiogram performed at that time revealed no evidence of myocardial infarction or any additional maladies.

Dr. Chang next saw Segreti on January 10, 1976. As per Dr. Chang's testimony, an electrocardiogram performed on that day revealed Segreti's heart rate to be normal. There was no evidence of heart damage or ischemia. Dr. Chang prescribed that Segreti resume his intake of Atromid-S in order to alleviate his elevated cholesterol level. Segreti telephoned Dr. Chang from work on January 16, 1976, complaining of aches and burning sensations in his upper chest, shoulder...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Braun v. Ahmed
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 27, 1987
    ...may call as a witness the doctor against whom she brought the action and question him as a medical expert" (Segreti v. Putnam Community Hosp., 88 A.D.2d 590, 592, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785). In this case, the defendant himself served as the plaintiffs' expert. Dr. Ahmed testified as to the requisite......
  • Giventer ex rel. Giventer v. Rementeria
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 30, 1999
    ...questions did not "bear solely on the alleged negligence of the codefendant physician" (id.). In Segreti v. Putnam Community Hosp., 88 A.D.2d 590, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785 [App.Div. 2nd Dept.1982] and Braun v. Ahmed, 127 A.D.2d 418, 515 N.Y.S.2d 473 [App.Div. 2nd Dept.1987], the Second Department c......
  • Weiss v. Nurse Midwifery Associates
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • April 30, 1984
    ...progeny, e.g., Keane v. Sloan Kettering Institute, 96 A.D.2d 505, 464 N.Y.S.2d 548 (2nd Dept.1983); Segreti v. Putnam Community Hospital, 88 A.D.2d 590, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785 (2nd Dept.1982), have applied the above stated rule to those medical malpractice situations where plaintiff was likely to......
  • Vega v. LaPalorcia
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 26, 2001
    ...expert witness (see, McDermott v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 15 N.Y.2d 20; Braun v Ahmed, 127 A.D.2d 418, 420; Segreti v Putnam Community Hosp., 88 A.D.2d 590, 592). Accordingly, the court should have permitted the plaintiffs' attorney to fully examine the defendant doctor regarding ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Witness examination
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books New York Objections
    • May 3, 2022
    ...because the doctor’s testimony is necessary to lay the medical foundation for what happened. Segreti v. Putnam Community Hosp., 88 A.D.2d 590, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785 (2d Dept. 1982). A party may not impeach the credibility of a witness whom he or she calls, unless the witness made a contradictory......
  • Witness examination
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2014 Contents
    • August 2, 2014
    ...because the doctor’s testimony is necessary to lay the medical foundation for what happened. Segreti v. Putnam Community Hosp ., 88 A.D.2d 590, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785 (2d Dept. 1982). A party may not impeach the credibility of a witness whom he or she calls, unless the witness made a contradictor......
  • Witness examination
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2018 Contents
    • August 2, 2018
    ...because the doctor’s testimony is necessary to lay the medical foundation for what happened. Segreti v. Putnam Community Hosp ., 88 A.D.2d 590, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785 (2d Dept. 1982). A party may not impeach the credibility of a witness whom he or she calls, unless the witness made a contradictor......
  • Witness examination
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2020 Contents
    • August 2, 2020
    ...because the doctor’s testimony is necessary to lay the medical foundation for what happened. Segreti v. Putnam Community Hosp ., 88 A.D.2d 590, 449 N.Y.S.2d 785 (2d Dept. 1982). A party may not impeach the credibility of a witness whom he or she calls, unless the witness made a contradictor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT