Sehested v. Kansas City
Decision Date | 09 June 1902 |
Citation | 68 S.W. 1068 |
Parties | SEHESTED et al. v. KANSAS CITY. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from circuit court, Jackson county; Edward P. Gates, Judge.
Action by Charles Sehested and others against Kansas City. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Dismissed.
Clarence S. Palmer and Fred H. Wood, for appellant. R. J. Ingraham, Chas. B. Adams, and Wash Adams, for respondents.
This is an action which was brought against the defendant on a contract, and in which the plaintiffs had judgment, and the defendant appealed. The merits of the case cannot be considered by us, for the reason that the affidavit required for an appeal by statute (section 808, Rev. St.) nowhere appears in the record before us. Clelland v. Shaw, 51 Mo. 440; State v. Wooldridge, 83 Mo. 193; Same v. Roscoe, 93 Mo. 146, 6 S. W. 117; Lengle v. Smith, 48 Mo. 276. And further, the order granting the appeal was to the effect that "defendant files affidavit for an appeal from the judgment and decision of the court in this cause, and upon consideration thereof the court grants and allows defendant an appeal in this cause as prayed for." This was insufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. In order to give it jurisdiction of an appeal, such an appeal must be prayed for by the party desiring to appeal, and must be allowed by the court from which the appeal was taken. It may be that the affidavit which was filed by the defendant in the trial court did not designate the court where the appeal was asked to be sent, and, if so, it was the duty of such trial court to have designated the proper court in its order. There was no appeal granted to this court. The filing of the record in this court was the act of the defendant, and the right to bring the case to this court by appeal cannot be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Broaddus
... ... 544 210 Mo. 1 STATE ex rel. TITLE GUARANTY & TRUST COMPANY v. BROADDUS et al., Judges Kansas City Court of Appeals Supreme Court of Missouri February 27, 1908 ... ... State ex ... rel. v. Woodson, 128 Mo. 514; Peters v. Edge, ... 87 Mo.App. 283; Sehested v. Kansas City, 68 S.W ... 1068; Thomas v. Finley, 3 Mo. 288; Railroad v ... Powell, 104 ... ...
-
The State ex rel. Brown v. Broaddus
... ... S ... 1899, is a jurisdictional prerequisite to taking an appeal in ... any case. Sehested v. Kansas City (Mo. App.), 68 ... S.W. 1068; State ex rel. v. Broaddus (Mo. Sup.), 108 ... S.W ... ...
-
Haskell v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company
...for appeal was filed. Shemwell v. McKinney, 214 Mo. 692; Wright v. Seiffle, 214 Mo. 694; Greenwood v. Parlin, 98 Mo.App. 407; Schested v. Kansas City, 68 S.W. 1068; v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 625. The court sustained respondent's motion for a new trial for the reason "that the court committed error......
-
Ivie v. Ewing
... ... JOEL EWING, Administrator, etc., Respondent Court of Appeals of Missouri, Kansas CityMay 7, 1906 ... May 7, ... Appeal ... from Schuyler ... citation or authorities upon this point as the court is ... familiar with the rule. See Sehested v. Kansas City, ... 68 S.W. 1068, and numerous decisions of the appellate courts ... of this ... ...