Selected Investments Corp. v. Ford, 37791

Citation320 P.2d 1113
Decision Date21 January 1958
Docket NumberNo. 37791,37791
PartiesSELECTED INVESTMENTS CORPORATION, a Corp., Plaintiff in Error, v. Oley FORD and Delma Ford, Defendants in Error.
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus by the Court

1. It is the duty of the Supreme Court to examine into its jurisdiction in each case, and if it is without jurisdiction, to dismiss the appeal.

2. By virtue of the provisions of 12 O.S.1955 Supp. § 972, all proceedings by case-made for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments of final orders shall be commenced within twenty days from the date the case-made is settled, and where case-made and petition in error are not filed in Supreme Court within twenty days from date case-made is settled, such court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and will dismiss the same.

Appeal from the District Court of Creek County; W. A. Barnett, Judge.

Action to recover the balance remaining due upon a conditional sales contract. Judgment for defendant cross-petitioners for rescission of the contract. Plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.

W. E. Green, Raymond G. Feldman, Wm. S. Hall, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Loeffler, Loeffler & Allen, Bristow, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case reveals that the petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on April 25, 1957. The record also reveals that the case-made was settled by stipulation and agreement of the parties on March 18, 1957, and certified by the court clerk on March 29, 1957.

It is apparent that this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine this case on appeal. 12 O.S.1955 Supp. § 972 requires that appeals be filed within twenty days of the date the case-made is settled. This is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived by the parties or overlooked by this court. Although no motion to dismiss has been filed, it is the duty of this court to examine into its jurisdiction in each case and if it is without jurisdiction, to dismiss the appeal. Video Independent Theatres, Inc., v. Walker, Okl., 308 P.2d 958.

Appeal dismissed.

WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.

DAVISON, J., concurs by reason of the rule of stari decisis.

The Court acknowledges the aid of the Supreme Court Commission in the preparation of this opinion. After a tentative opinion was written by the Commission the cause was assigned to a Justice of this Court. Thereafter upon report...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Wanner v. Wanner, 37363
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 29 Septiembre 1959
    ...Inc. v. Walker, Okl., 308 P.2d 958; Albert v. Card, Okl., 317 P.2d 766; Jordan v. Snakard, Okl., 320 P.2d 396; Selected Investments Corp. v. Ford, Okl., 320 P.2d 1113; and Campbell v. Campbell, Okl., 325 P.2d 81; Curry v. Haynes, Okl., 326 P.2d The defendant contends that the order entered ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT